From:                              eNews, LTA ANZ
Sent:                               Tuesday, 26 May 2015 1:42 PM
To:                                   Jones, Helen (Legal)
Subject:                          Environmental Manager 1002: Oil & gas leak rise 'serious';
Hunt's dredging back flip; Vic EPA review
Please click here if you are having problems viewing this email
| 
 
 Rise
    in offshore oil leaks 'a serious concern', NOPSEMA CEO says A 25% increase in
    uncontrolled hydrocarbon leaks in Australian waters over the past two years
    was a "serious concern" and a fall in the oil price no excuse,
    head of the national offshore oil & gas watchdog says. The National Offshore
    Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority's (NOPSEMA) latest
    offshore performance report
    showed most leaks in Commonwealth waters were in the lower category
    (1-300kg).  But the jump from 20
    leaks in 2013 to 25 in 2014 was a "serious concern due to the risk of
    ignition and potential safety and environment consequences", NOPSEMA
    CEO Stuart Smith said. "Anecdotal
    evidence from other jurisdictions internationally suggests industry
    maintenance performance often drops around four to six months after a large
    fall in the oil price," he said. There was no evidence "of a
    correlation in Australia with the current downturn in prices" but
    "duty holders should keep in mind that any changes in processes made
    as a result of reduced budgets should not compromise safety and
    environmental outcomes in any way", Smith said. NOPSEMA would continue
    to monitor the issue, he said. While most
    uncontrolled hydrocarbon releases were in the lowest mass category, the
    rate per 100m barrels of oil equivalent was consistently higher than the
    reported international regulators forum (IRF) average, the report said.
    Most occurred at fixed platform facilities.  Of the 25 releases, 13
    were at normally attended platforms, six were from floating production,
    storage and offloading vessels, four were at "not normally
    attended" platforms and two were from pipelines. Six hydrocarbon vapour
    releases were due to flares being extinguished. Other causes included a
    crude oil leak from a subsea pipeline, well fluids leaking from a subsea
    control module and leaks of petroleum-based liquids or gas from topside
    equipment. The report said while environmental impacts from the releases
    were not significant, they showed a need to improve prevention measures. 'Ageing
    facilities need robust management'The data suggested
    "a significant number of unplanned events occurred on ageing
    facilities", Smith said. Deficient preventive maintenance, the second
    largest cause of occupational health and safety (OHS) incidents in 2014,
    also had "the potential to create environmental impacts, as has been
    seen with unplanned hydrocarbon releases from ageing pipeline
    infrastructure". Ageing facilities
    placed an increased burden on project resources and often required more
    maintenance and repair, he said. "It is crucial that operators of aged
    or ageing facilities ensure that integrity management systems and processes
    are applied robustly together with regular audits to ensure their continued
    quality and effectiveness," Smith said. In 2014, NOPSEMA did
    146 inspections covering 202 facilities, titles, wells and petroleum
    activities. Its environmental assessment time frames were reduced by 40%
    due to higher quality titleholder submissions and regulatory amendments,
    the report said. Smith said environmental management inspections would
    increase in 2015. A total of 119
    petroleum activities were authorised through accepted environment plans in
    2014, 38% down from the 192 authorised in 2013, the report said.  Of those approved last
    year, 42% were production facilities or pipelines, 19% were activities like
    repairs to subsea installations, production cessation and non-production
    phases before decommissioning, 16% were drilling activities, 14% were
    seismic surveys, 7% were geophysical or geotechnical surveys and 2% were
    construction activities. In December 2014
    the Federal Government tabled a Bill to dramatically expand NOPSEMA's
    jurisdiction to streamline regulatory arrangements. (EM
    09/12/14). Quarry
    directors 'more culpable' A NSW north-coast rock
    quarry company's capacity to pay fines ordered by the Land and Environment
    Court (LEC) is "questionable" as it has "no assets",
    has multiple creditors and "is no longer a going concern". At the Corinda
    quarry's height of production Wyanga Holdings Pty Ltd extracted 368,363
    tonnes of gravel and/or rock from February 1, 2012,
    to January 31, 2013. However, that was more than seven times its
    environmental protection licence's (EPL) annual limit of 50,000 tonnes.
    Wyanga delivered almost all the extracted material to Leighton Contractors
    Pty Ltd and Fulton Hogan Pty Ltd's Pacific Highway upgrade for the then NSW
    Roads and Traffic Authority. Some tonnage was supplied to Coffs Harbour
    City Council. The highway upgrade between Sapphire and Woolgoolga finished
    in late 2013. On May 15,
    NSW LEC Justice Terry Sheahan fined Wyanga and its two directors a
    total of $106,500. Wyanga and directors Joseph and Louise Cauchi
    pleaded guilty to nine of 12 charges and agreed to pay $90,000 for the
    Environment Protection Authority's (EPA) legal costs. Justice Sheahan
    sentenced Wyanga and the Cauchis on all 12 matters after they exceeded the
    EPL annual extraction limit over 2.5 successive licence years and gave
    misleading information to the EPA (EM
    17/06/14). Justice Sheahan
    held Joseph Cauchi "more culpable" than Louise for the EPL
    exceedances, fining him a total of $76,000 for four breaches of the
    Protection of the Environment Operations (PEO) Act 1997. He fined Louise
    Cauchi a total of $27,000 and found her "primarily culpable" for
    supplying "false and misleading" information in a 2012 annual
    return to the EPA. He was satisfied the failure to disclose the exceedance
    was "at least negligent, and really quite reckless". He noted the
    prosecutor conceded it couldn't establish the "criminal onus"
    that Wyanga and its directors "deliberately misled" the EPA and
    it remained a "rational hypothesis" the breach was
    "inadvertent". However, the prosecutor submitted there was
    "no satisfactory explanation" for the omission because the
    defendants disclosed other breaches in the return. Those were unrelated to
    the proceedings before Justice Sheahan. The judge
    said Joseph and Louise were Wyanga's "directing mind and
    will". He ordered Wyanga to pay a total $3,500 for its four PEO Act
    breaches. Justice Sheahan apportioned the fines among the three
    defendants to avoid "possible triple" punishment. Outside the court
    on May 21, EPA north branch director Gary Davey said
    Wyanga's EPL was revoked after the court case. Earlier,
    in August 2013, the EPA had suspended the licence after issuing
    repeated warnings about the exceedances, "which the company continued
    to ignore", Davey said. (Environment
    Protection Authority v Wyanga Holdings Pty Ltd; Environment Protection
    Authority v Cauchi [2015], NSWLEC 78,
    15/05/2015)  Vic
    EPA review starts June The Vic Environment
    Protection Authority's powers to ensure environmental justice principles
    are adhered to and "the environment is protected for the benefit of
    the community" will come under scrutiny in a new review. Vic environment,
    climate change and water minister Lisa Neville announced the inquiry last
    week, saying the relevant legislation was almost 46 years old and the
    regulator needed to "keep up with the times". The review would
    start in June and report in March 2016, she said. Former state justice
    department secretary Penny Armytage will chair the review. Former 2009
    Bushfires Royal Commission CEO Jane Brockington and NT EPA
    non-executive director Janice Van Reyk will join the review committee.
    Its terms of reference
    include examining the scope and adequacy of the EPA's statutory powers; the
    EPA's role in public health issues; community and industry expectations;
    and its "appropriate" role in protecting the environment. Whether
    the EPA's governance and funding allow it to "effectively and
    efficiently" discharge its powers and perform its duties would be
    studied. Tas EPA leadership changes The Tas Government has
    appointed a new Environment Protection Authority (EPA) director and three
    new board members, including a new chair and deputy chair. Former resources
    director at the state Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and
    Environment (DPIPWE) Wes Ford
    has been appointed as EPA director to replace retiring director Alex
    Schaap. Ford has held several senior govt positions, most recently
    AgriGrowth acting deputy secretary. Warren Jones has
    been elevated to EPA chair after serving as deputy chair since
    2012. Jones was DPIPWE's environment/EPA division GM. The new board
    deputy chair is Anthony Ferrier, Kingborough Council's current deputy GM.
    Professor Colin Buxton, a former director of the University of Tas's
    Fisheries, Aquaculture and Coasts Centre was appointed to the EPA board. He
    joins new member Catherine Murdoch, Tasmanian Irrigation Pty Ltd
    environment manager. Hunt go-ahead for Abbot Point EIS Federal environment
    minister Greg Hunt has asked the Qld Government to produce an environmental
    impact statement (EIS) to support its plan to dump dredge material from its
    Abbot Point Port's expansion proposal on industrial land next to an
    existing coal terminal (EM
    31/03/15, 29/04/14). Renamed the
    "Abbot Point growth gateway project", the new Qld Govt wants to
    dispose of project dredge material on unused industrial land instead of on
    nearby protected wetlands or undersea within the Great Barrier Reef (GBR)
    marine park, as the former state govt had proposed and the Federal Govt had
    approved. Hunt
    on May 14 decided
    he would assess the proposal by an EIS under the federal Environment
    Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act. That was despite a new
    bilateral agreement with Qld under s45 of the EPBC Act allowing the state
    govt to assess development projects on the Federal Govt's behalf. The new Qld Govt's
    coal terminal expansion project would dredge about 61ha of seabed within
    the port's limits, outside the GBR park, it said. It would increase the
    port's capacity to handle coal exports from 50m to 120m tonnes a year to
    cater for planned Galilee Basin coal exports, including Adani Mining Pty
    Ltd's proposed $16.5m Carmichael Mine. "The full cost of
    the EIS will be paid for by mine proponent, Adani, not taxpayers, under an
    agreement with the govt," Qld state development minister Dr Anthony
    Lynham said. Meantime, the legality of Hunt's 2014 approval for the
    Carmichael mine is being challenged for a third time in the Qld Land Court (EM
    20/01/15). In a statement
    of reasons, Hunt said he'd reviewed Qld Govt advice and found the project
    "was not eligible" to be assessed under the bilateral agreement.
    Given that, plus a lack of detail on the project's final design and
    mitigation measures, and uncertainty about "the nature and scale"
    of its impact on matters of national environmental significance (the GBR
    world heritage protected area) Hunt said he'd accepted advice he assess it
    with an EIS. He agreed, "in particular" with his
    "department's view assessment by EIS would provide a robust and
    thorough assessment … and the opportunity for public engagement" to
    help him make an informed decision on whether to allow the port's expansion
    to proceed. GBR
    reg change to formalise dredge backflipHunt's decision (above) was a backflip
    on his October 2014 decision to not require an EIS for dredge
    material to be disposed on Canley Vale wetlands next to the GBR marine
    park. It triggered a Federal Court challenge during which Hunt promised the
    court he would provide one days' warning to the Qld Environment Defenders
    Office of any decision on the former Qld Govt's project application. (EM
    20/01/15). But
    on May 17, Hunt said he'd "formally approved" an
    amendment to GBR regulations to prevent any dredge material being disposed
    "in the entire 344,400km2 park". "This covers
    100% of the area under Commonwealth legislative control and 99% of the
    world heritage area." The Qld Govt had committed to a dredge disposal
    ban in the remaining 3,000km2 area under its jurisdiction which
    included port areas, he said. The regulatory change has yet to be
    registered. Hunt's GBR protection
    decisions precede a UNESCO World Heritage Committee (WHC) decision on
    whether to list the GBR world heritage area as "in danger" at a
    meeting in June. Coral Sea protection increased Roughly 12% of the
    Coral Sea will be covered if the Federal Government expands the Great
    Barrier Reef (GBR) and Torres Strait "particularly sensitive sea
    area" (PSSA). The International
    Maritime Organisation (IMO) had agreed to the proposal to protect the
    south-west Coral Sea, which expanded the PSSA from 403,000km2 to
    958,000km2, the govt said. Designation as a PSSA covered areas
    with "significant ecological, socio-economic or scientific attributes
    [that] may be vulnerable to damage by international
    shipping", the govt said. The GBR was declared the world's first PSSA
    in 1990. About 430 ships
    navigate the PSSA waters annually, with certain areas deemed challenging
    because of reefs, cays, islets, sandbars and shoal patches. There are 341
    species listed for conservation in the area. There will also be
    three new associated protective measures (APM) to support the PSSA, a new
    area ships must avoid and with supporting two-way routes. They would
    enhance ship safety, reduce the risk of groundings and allow more time for
    intervention in developing situations like a ship suffering a mechanical
    breakdown. Deputy Prime Minister
    and infrastructure and regional development minister Warren Truss said the
    move showed the govt was implementing measures outlined in the north-east
    shipping management plan released in October 2014. It's expected
    the PSSA measures will come into effect in June and the APMs
    in January 2016. $US45m
    to retire Alcoa site Alcoa of Australia Ltd
    says closing and rehabilitating its Anglesea coal mine and power station
    on August 31 will cost up to $US45m. In February 2014
    Alcoa put the plant up for sale but when it didn't sell the company decided
    to close the entire operation in August. The Anglesea power station had
    previously supplied 40% of power for the Port Henry aluminium smelter in
    Geelong which closed on August 1, 2014. An Alcoa spokesperson
    told EM
    discussions with the Vic Government on rehabilitating the site were
    ongoing. The company expected restructuring-related charges for asset
    retirement obligations and environmental remediation would be about
    $US40-45m, he said. Vic energy and
    resources minister Lily D'Ambrosio told EM
    "Alcoa is responsible for the rehabilitation of the site and there are
    a number of regulatory measures that ensure this". Alcoa would prepare
    a mine rehabilitation plan for the govt's "earth resources
    regulator" within Vic's new economic development, jobs, transport and
    resources department. The Vic Environment Protection Authority would
    regulate the power station site's remediation. Rehabilitation was "not
    a quick process", D'Ambrosio said. "Work is expected to take a
    number of years to complete, following closure at the end
    of August 2015." Alcoa's spokesperson
    said the company didn't have any long-term plans for the site. "We
    will work through the details of the decommissioning and rehabilitation
    plan over the coming months in consultation with the relevant govt
    authorities." Draft
    CFI to ERF intentions released It's been proposed
    nine carbon farming initiative (CFI) determinations covering agriculture,
    vegetation management & landfill and alternative waste treatment be
    updated and shifted to the emissions reduction fund (ERF)
    from July 1. Methodology
    determinations on using covered anaerobic ponds and engineered biodigesters
    to destruct methane generated from dairy cow manure and piggeries are among
    those targeted. So too are determinations on reducing greenhouse gas (GHG)
    emissions, managing regrowth of native forests, measurement-based methods
    for new farm forestry plantations, sequestering carbon in soils and using
    environmental or mallee plantings for reforestation. The federal
    environment department last week sought
    submissions by June 2 on its proposals to update CFI
    "transitioning methods". It would ensure all transitions methods
    "are consistent with the ERF legislation, easy to use and more
    streamlined", the dept said. The proposals were foreshadowed in an
    energy white paper before the Federal Government's first auction of
    Australian carbon credit units in April. A draft explanatory statement
    issued under environment minister Greg Hunt's authority said the carbon
    credits (CFI-ERF) methodology determination variation
    2015 would make "minor" amendments. The dept consulted the Clean
    Energy Regulator in developing the variation. Proposed amendments
    were "primarily" to ensure CFI determinations continued to
    operate as "originally intended" in light of changes made to the
    Carbon Credits (CFI) Act 2011, the statement said. They were also aimed at
    ensuring there were "no unintended consequences for eligible offsets
    projects wanting to apply the determinations". It's proposed 17 other
    CFI determinations will be revoked
    because new methods covering the same activities have
    "superseded" them. The dept said existing projects "will not
    be affected or disadvantaged". Projects could continue to use methods
    in place when they were registered or transition to a new method "if
    more advantageous". Water
    commission abolished A year after the
    Federal Government moved to abolish the National Water Commission by axing
    its funding in the 2014-15 budget, a National Water Commission (Abolition) Bill
    was passed by Parliament on May 14. The Bill transferred the
    commission's key responsibilities to the Productivity Commission (PC). Editorial
    team Editor: Deborah Nesbitt. Email: deborah.nesbitt@thomsonreuters.comJournalist: Kim Berry. Managing Editor: Helen Jones. Twitter: @EnviroManagerTR  |  |  | |||||||||||||||||||||
