Issue 233
, Friday 29 May 2015
Click here to view printer friendly PDF
In this issue
[1]
The trade union movement looks set to ramp up its
campaign on paid parental leave (PPL), with an Australian Council of Trade
Unions (ACTU) draft policy document demanding government-funded PPL be
boosted to 26 weeks and employers be required to supplement it with their
own schemes.
The May 7 draft policy paper, obtained
by Workforce
ahead of the ACTU triennial Congress next week, would commit the peak union
body to lobby for:
·
a govt-funded PPL
scheme of 26 weeks paid "at no less than the national minimum wage
plus superannuation"; and
·
a "mandated
top-up of the govt scheme to full wage replacement to ensure a
co-contribution from employers".
On May 12, Treasurer Joe Hockey
announced the govt would prevent parents accessing both the govt and
employer PPL schemes, which other senior ministers described as
'double-dipping' (WF
15/05/15).
Unions will also "campaign and bargain for an
increase to the 'dad and partner pay scheme' to provide eligible employees
with four weeks leave rather than two", the policy document said. They
will push for the accrual of entitlements including payment of public
holidays and employer super contributions during periods of paid and unpaid
parental and carers' leave.
Strengthen
bullying and adverse action claims
The ACTU document proposes extending the Fair Work
Commission's (FWC) jurisdiction to issue stop-bullying orders to "all
workers, not just those employed by constitutional corporations".
Unions should be able to apply to stop "systemic bullying rather than
the sole focus on individual complaints required to be made public",
it said. The ACTU proposed removing the "reasonable management action
taken in a reasonable manner" defence to bullying claims. It argued
the defence was "a means for employers to cover workplace
bullying".
It also wanted to reinstate the "essentially
beneficial and protective operation of the general protections provisions
of the FW Act" through either:
·
a positive
description of the relevant test of characterisation as an objective test;
or
·
excluding the
"purely subjective approach" to ascertaining the reasons for
adverse action.
The proposal responds to union fears courts are in
effect allowing decision-makers' evidence they did not take adverse action
for a prohibited reason to determine claims, after employer wins in the
High Court's BHP Coal
(WF
17/10/14) and Barclay
v Bendigo TAFE (WF7/09/2012).
Regulate labour
hire and supply chains: ACTU
The draft policy document called for FW Act
amendments "to facilitate and support parties negotiating arrangements
which have industry-wide or supply chain impact".
"In particular, Congress is concerned to
ensure collective agreements can cover labour hire workers who are economically
dependent servants and agents of an entity with which they have no
'employment relationship'," it said.
The document backed "enterprise bargaining
across an industry or supply chain" as "more reflective of the
modern organisation of industries operating on the basis of joint
production and joint employment".
It proposed "the establishment of a
comprehensive national scheme for the registration, licensing and
regulation of labour hire agencies". In addition, unions should have
"unrestricted" rights to represent independent contractors. The
current system requires Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
approval for independent contractors to collectively bargain. The ACTU
proposed banning enterprise agreements (EAs) which "cover only one employee"
and EAs "made with a small number of employees prior to the engagement
of the rest of the workforce".
More worker
protections needed for strikes
The ACTU paper (above)
called for more protections for workers involved in strikes, ie:
·
removing the
secondary boycott provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010;
·
requiring
employers to give "three clear working days' written notice" of a
lockout; and
·
ensuring employer
response action "must be a "proportional response" to
employees' protected action.
Lift good faith
bargaining requirements
The ACTU document proposed higher standards for
good faith bargaining including:
·
requiring
employers to disclose relevant and material information to bargaining
parties in a timely manner, while ensuring genuinely confidential
information is "treated appropriately";
·
requiring the
employer's "principal decision-maker" to participate in
bargaining;
·
prohibiting
employers from submitting an agreement to a vote until the bargaining
representatives are agreed a course or bargaining is at an impasse; and
·
promoting a
"normal expectation" that bargaining parties should reach an
agreement unless there are genuine reasons based on reasonable grounds not
to do so.
'Last resort'
arbitration for FWC
·
FW Act amendments
to empower FWC "to arbitrate disputes about any matters arising under
awards, agreements or the NES, as a last resort"; and
·
FW Act and state
referral legislation amendments to expressly permit the federal system,
including the FWC, "to deal with all public sector employment matters
that state govts have argued are subject to constitutional limitations,
such as job security and staffing levels".
Unions to
campaign on youth super
The draft document proposes an ACTU campaign to
"expand the superannuation guarantee to workers under the age of 18,
and remove the discriminatory requirement that workers under 18 must work
at least 30 hours per week to receive employer super contributions".
Other youth-oriented policies included:
·
opposition to
unpaid internships that are not part of an accredited course; and
·
a resolution
"to explore and support new organising strategies, particularly those
that integrate technology with campaigning".
FEG, modern
award review and IFA changes
The ACTU also proposed campaigning to ensure:
·
all employee
entitlements, including deductions, are fully recoverable from the Fair
Entitlements Guarantee (FEG);
·
abolition of
compulsory four yearly reviews of modern awards; and
·
abolition of
individual flexibility agreements (IFAs).
(Source:
Workforce 19625, 22 May, 2015)
[2]
Industry superannuation fund Cbus should reduce
its "heavy" reliance on unions in collecting arrears and appoint
more independent directors to counter a "culture of
proprietorship" from sponsor organisations.
However, while the report found past Cbus
practices had risked breaching privacy laws it said those practices had
developed as a response to the serious problem of super non-compliance in
the construction industry.
Professor Graeme Samuel with consultant Robert Van
Woerkom made the recommendations in a report released last week in response
to the Trade Union Royal Commission findings.
The royal cmn found senior Cbus members had
secretly leaked private member contact data to the construction union in
relation to Lis-Con.
The Qld construction company owed employees
hundreds of thousands of dollars in super and was the target of a union
industrial campaign.
Samuel's report – commissioned by Cbus - said the
data leaks appeared to be the "rogue" actions of two employees and
an "extreme extension" of past practices developed in Cbus of
giving unions personal member data to collect arrears.
Indeed, the report said Cbus may now be too cautious about
members' data, with coordinators adopting practices that "excessively
err on the side of caution relative to what might be regarded as reasonable
compliance with privacy laws".
While this reflected a "significant
behavioural and cultural swing", Samuel warned "an unduly
cautious attitude" may "hamper" coordinators'
ability to carry out their duties and collect arrears.
Regulatory
failure exacerbated reliance on unions
The report said a "large" number of
builders saw super compliance as "more the exception than the
rule", with some regularly "gaming the system" through
"quite sophisticated techniques" to avoid detection of
non-compliance.
Techniques included:
·
payment of salary
sacrifice contributions but non-payment of super guarantee contributions;
·
payment of only
part of the super amount so a payment still appears recorded; and
·
non-payment for up
to three months, knowing alerts and collection will not occur until after
that and in the meantime they gain a cash flow advantage.
The report said the Australian Taxation Office's
lack of enforcement and the slow, bureaucratic processes of Cbus' external
collection agencies exacerbated the reliance on unions for arrears.
The lack of regulatory effort took place in an
industry beset with a "very itinerant" workforce, overseas 457
visa workers, sham contracting and a high level of bankruptcies and phoenix
companies.
Unions have
benefit of 'certain negotiating strategies'
As a result Cbus "relied heavily" on
unions to alert it about non-compliance and "bring about that
compliance".
"Unions have certain negotiating strategies
that are not available to Cbus in the protection of members'
benefits," the report said.
Samuel endorsed unions' role as the "canary
in the coal mine" and said as unions pursue arrears under enterprise
agreements their assistance in collection was "inevitable".
But he said the "deficiency in the process in
the past has led to excessive reliance on external parties, including
unions".
Cbus' modernisation of its processes post-leaks
"will enhance significantly its ability to collect arrears" and
reduce the need to provide personal info to unions.
"The likely outcome of the transformation of
arrears processing will be to reduce the reliance on unions in assisting or
providing an expedient process for collection of arrears on behalf of Cbus
to exceptional cases."
More diversity
and independence needed
On Cbus' culture, Samuel said union and employer
board directors seemed to "act cohesively with the common pursuit of
the best interests of the members of the super fund".
But the board also "effectively represents a
joint venture" between unions and employer organisations.
That "inevitably creates a culture of
proprietorship" by the sponsor organisation".
"[T]hat proprietorship culture permeates
through to impact in varying ways on those dealing with the organisation
and in particular its employees," the report said.
The report recommended Cbus consider additional
independent board directors – though not a majority – as an advantage to
Cbus future governance "both internally and in its dealings with
external parties".
In the case of Cbus member coordinators, the
report noted some of their approaches had been influenced by their past or
current union membership.
The report recommended a review of the coordinator
section to assess whether a "more diverse background and
expertise" would make it more effective.
Sub-committee
considers indie directors
Cbus CEO David Atkin said the fund (above) "will
continue to work closely with our sponsoring organisations, both unions and
employers, who have a legitimate role in ensuring compliance with the
payment of super across the industry". "But we will build our
internal capability, modernise our arrears program to allow for pro-active
identification of employers not doing the right thing, strengthen oversight
and management of the processes in-house." Cbus was realigning roles
across the fund, including by bringing in greater diversity and skills in
its workplace distribution unit, he said. A sub-committee would explore how
more independent directors could strengthen expertise and advantage
operations.
Review may influence
TURC 'culture' finding
TURC Cmr Dyson Heydon said the cmn would further
investigate Cbus this year, including its culture and why its employees
deceived the cmn about giving the union the private member data. In his
interim report
last year, Cmr Heydon appeared to support counsel claims of 'cultural
corruption' at Cbus but accepted not finding should be made at this stage,
saying the Samuel review may cast further light.
(Source:
Workforce 19625, 22 May, 2015)
[3]
Battlelines are forming over the constitutional
recognition of Indigenous Australians, with a poll suggesting 75% of
Australians would support it, a conservative MP saying it is racially
divisive and doomed to fail, and Indigenous, human rights and political
leaders meeting to discuss the referendum question. Australia could know
the form of that question as early as next month even though the vote
itself is possibly two years away, Attorney-General George Brandis has
said. Brandis said the Joint Standing Committee chaired by Ken Wyatt
is due to deliver its report on the question's form next month before Prime
Minister Tony Abbott meets Indigenous leaders to discuss it, at a meeting
to which he has invited Opposition leader Bill Shorten. Brandis said he had
not heard Liberal Senator Cory Bernardi's comments
the constitutional recognition question was racially divisive and doomed to
fail but was not concerned by them. "It's in the nature of a
conversation that different people will bring different views to the table
and we have not settled on the final form of the referendum question. I'm
on the record as saying that I think that we should be relatively modest in
our aspirations here because anything that is too radical is going to
frighten public opinion away and the referendum would fail." However,
a May 18 referendum poll by advocacy group Recognise found
75% of all Australians and 87% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
people would have voted yes if a referendum were held on that day. That
included a majority in all states (the hurdle for constitutional
referendums to succeed) and two-thirds of Liberal voters. Polity Research
conducted the survey, polling 2,700 voters from the wider community and 750
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. Recognise is part of Reconciliation
Australia and is supported by a range of organisations including Telstra,
Qantas and Sodexo
Can
constitution accommodate rep body?
Brandis was speaking on May 21 after an
Indigenous Leaders Roundtable in Broome convened by Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner Mick Gooda and Human
Rights Commissioner Tim Wilson. The roundtable discussed the proposal by
Cape York Institute's Noel Pearson to create an Indigenous representative
body to provide advice on proposed laws that impact Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander people. The Institute had sent the proposal to Wyatt's
cttee for consideration (here and here). Brandis
would not be drawn on Pearson's proposal or Sydney University
constitutional law Professor Anne Twomey's suggestion
on May 20 of how the constitution could be changed to accommodate
it. Wyatt's Constitutional Recognition committee
is to report on the referendum question by June 30.
(Source:
Discrimination Alert 470, 25 May, 2015)
Improving
economic benefits of native title
Meanwhile, the Indigenous leaders roundtable has called
on the Govt to work with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders about
"pursuing economic development on native title land". "This
is an unprecedented meeting of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
leaders to tackle the challenges facing our communities once native title
determinations have been made," Gooda said. "Property rights are
central to human rights because they underpin the autonomy and security of
individuals and communities," Wilson said. Attorney-General George
Brandis said "it's important to think of it as a property right so
that members of Indigenous communities can get the economic benefit and the
economic independence out of the native title system that it hasn't been
perfectly good at producing for them so far".
[4]
The Federal Government will "partner with
Australia's largest employers to help increase their average Indigenous
employment rate to at least 3% of their workforces by 2020", assistant
employment minister Luke Hartsuyker has announced. Its Employment Parity
Initiative will target an extra 20,000 Indigenous Australians in jobs within
five years by supporting private sector employers such as Accor Hotel Group
and Compass
Group Aust. Talking to the May 20 Indigenous Employment
Conference, Hartsuyker said
this was on top of the Commonwealth public sector target of
"increasing its Indigenous workforce to 3% by 2018, which means an
extra 7,500 people". Hartsuyker said the Govt's aim of having 3% of
C'wealth procurement contracts with Indigenous suppliers by 2020 would
boost its current value of $6.2m to some $135m a year. By supporting
Indigenous business that should also boost Indigenous employment, he said.
"As at 31 March 2015, there were
around 78,000 Indigenous job seekers on the Job Services Australia
caseload, around 9% of the total caseload. Of these, 65% were in the most
disadvantaged streams in Job Services Australia (JSA) - compared to
38% of all job seekers," he said. He said JSA fees have been
restructured around job retention with "new outcome payments at 4, 12
and 26 weeks". "For the first time, there will be Indigenous
Outcome Targets, to ensure jobactive
(the employment services model replacing JSA July 1)
providers are achieving job outcomes for Indigenous job seekers at the same
rate as other job seekers in their region."
(Source:
Discrimination Alert 470, 25 May, 2015)
[5]
An employer springing a disciplinary meeting on an
employee was a "threatening" rather than a reasonable management
action, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) has found.
Despite the ambush, FWC refused a stop-bullying
order because the employer dealt with the probationary employee fairly
after the incident and in the face of the worker's inflammatory emails
calling for the dismissal of his alleged persecutors.
Radiologist James Willis complained that
on May 30, 2014 the general manager and human resources manager
of his employer Capital Radiology Pty Ltd held a disciplinary interview
with him without notice.
He said the GM "unreasonably berated
him" while the HR manager "demonstrated amusement at his
predicament".
Willis sought stop-bullying orders against his
employer and the two managers.
Capital Radiology had lost a bid to have the
application dismissed after Commissioner John Lewin rejected its claim
the meeting was reasonable management action (WF
20/02/15).
Employer
patient in face of worker's inflammatory emails
In the substantive decision, Cmr Lewin said the
meeting without warning was "unreasonable action carried out in an
unreasonable manner".
Willis was "subject to severe criticism based
on complaints by a person employed by a different entity", he said.
This would have been "threatening", especially seeing as Willis
had only recently started work and was on probation.
The cmr said a reasonable course of action would
have been to advise Willis of the meeting and its purpose and then explain
expectations about his performance.
Capital Radiology engaged in "repeated
unreasonable behaviour" by starting a disciplinary process which
"risked injury of Willis' psychological health and wellbeing", he
said.
Cmr Lewin noted Willis' relationship with Capital
Radiology had become "very strained" and Willis had brought
Federal Circuit Court proceedings against it for alleged "breaches of
his workplace rights".
But the cmr found that since Capital Radiology
withdrew notice of the disciplinary process it had not taken any further
unreasonable actions and had kept the two managers away from Willis.
The employer handled the matter with "restraint
and patience" and showed "careful attention to procedural
fairness" while Willis was now stood down with pay, he said.
Willis, on the other hand, "has not been
fully cooperative" and had sent "inflammatory emails" which
made "serious allegations" against the two managers, demanding
their dismissal and giving "derogatory descriptions" of their
character.
Cmr Lewin held in light of Capital Radiology's
"fair procedure" he was not satisfied there was any risk of
bullying to Willis, and dismissed the application.
(James
Willis v Marie Gibson; Capital Radiology; Peita Carroll [2015], FWC 3538,
22/05/2015)
(Source:
Workforce Daily 19631, 25 May, 2015)
[6]
Improvements to the social wage such as health,
education and retirement incomes will be at the centre of the Australian
Council of Trade Union's (ACTU) political campaign, secretary Dave Oliver
has revealed.
In an interview with Workforce Daily, Oliver said the main
focus of its triennial Congress this week will be achieving endorsement of
the peak body's 'Build a Better Future' campaign to be rolled out "in
workplaces, online, in communities and marginal electorates" (WF
6/03/15).
Of the six points central to the campaign, five
are policies to be implemented by government, including improvements in the
social wage, ie:
·
universally
accessible healthcare;
·
highest quality
education;
·
decent public
services;
·
dignity in
retirement through the pension and superannuation system; and
·
"a fair go
for all, including cracking down on multinational tax avoidance".
The sixth point in the charter is "rights at
work". Oliver said "the main focus [of this point] is to stop the
Abbott government attacking penalty rates, minimum wages and impeding the
rights of workers to actively organise and campaign".
He said the ACTU had a positive agenda as well as
"stuff we're fighting against", eg expanding collective
bargaining rights to include multi-employer bargaining (WF
22/05/15).
"This will encourage collaboration rather
than confrontation in bargaining, allowing employers and employees to
engage at a higher level."
Oliver argued elements of the "social policy
ask" such as improvements in health and education were also
"industrial" in nature because "we do represent workers in
those particular industries".
Digital
platforms encourage 'lowest cost' work
Oliver reiterated his pledge made at the National
Press Club to set up a taskforce on how to represent workers in the 'liquid
economy' – digital platforms like Uber and Freelancer.com which treat them
as independent contractors (WF
8/05/15).
"Workers are bidding on ebay style platforms
for a parcel of work, where the work goes to the lowest bidder," he
said.
"How the hell do you regulate this? How do
you ensure [workers] are protected by minimum standards like super and
workers' comp? This is a real challenge not only for our movement but govts
now and in the future," Oliver said.
ACTU reaffirms
boycott of 'political' TURC
Despite the Trade Union Royal Commission (TURC)
discussion paper flagging proposed anti-racketeering provisions and new
restrictions on who can hold union office (WF
22/05/15), Oliver was adamant the ACTU would not engage
with TURC.
"Our position is very clear - it's a
political witch-hunt," he said. "If [TURC] wants our views on
those matters [in the discussion paper] – it can look at our website or the
submission we've made to legitimate bodies such as the Productivity
Commission review of workplace relations and Senate bodies."
(Source:
Workforce Daily 19631, 25 May, 2015)
[7]
SA WorkCover has secured an application to strike
out an injured worker's notice of dispute because of "sufficient
inactivity" associated with the alleged psychiatric injury claim.
On February 21, 2014, Catherine Henstridge submitted a claim for
compensation for an alleged psychiatric injury for "acute stress and
anxiety from conflict at work". It identified the date
as January 10, 2014. On April 10, 2014, Employers
Mutual Ltd (EML) rejected the claim because it said Henstridge had not
suffered an injury. But on May 15, 2014, Henstridge lodged a
notice of dispute challenging that rejection with SA Unions' help. The
matter was referred to EML to reconsider but its decision was confirmed.
The matter was then listed for a conciliation conference
on August 22, 2014. The conference was adjourned twice.
Then on October 31, 2014, the SA Workers
Compensation Tribunal (WCT) was advised Henstridge had instructed SA Unions
to concede the dispute. EML's consent orders were sent to SA Unions and
on December 5, 2014, SA Unions advised EML Henstridge had
withdrawn her instructions.
The WCT re-listed a conciliation conference but
Henstridge failed to attend. EML then filed the want of prosecution
application.
SA Unions advice 'likely ended matter'
WCT Deputy President (DP) Judge Brian
Gilchrist said it was likely SA Unions' advice that Henstridge had
instructed it to concede the dispute ended the matter and the tribunal was
entitled to act on that advice and dismiss the notice of dispute.
"That is not, however, the ground upon which this order is now sought.
It is grounded upon the assertion that there has been a want of prosecution."
On that basis, and given case law in WorkCover
v Nonkovic, there were grounds to dismiss the notice of
dispute. "It is sufficient to say that what is involved here is a
general discretion and, [while] that discretion is unfettered, significant
factors to be considered are the length of the delay, the explanation for
the delay, the hardship to the worker if the action is dismissed [and] the
prejudice to the compensation authority."
DP Gilchrist said there was "nothing to
suggest anything untoward about EML's conduct. Given the delay it has
plainly been prejudiced". He said it was hard to measure the prejudice
Henstridge "will suffer because on one view she has already
conclusively conceded the dispute". Even if she had an arguable claim,
DP Gilchrist said there had "been a sufficient level of inactivity on
[Henstridge's] part to warrant the grant of the order sought". He
dismissed the notice of dispute for want of prosecution. (WorkCover (Uniting Care Wesley
Adelaide Inc) v Henstridge [2015], SAWCT 14,
30/04/2015)
(Source:
Workers Compensation Report 1018, 26 May 2015)
[8]
Victoria Trades Hall Council (VTHC) secretary Luke
Hilakari has revealed a plan to target school children for union membership
and organise young workers in hospitality and retail industries.
Hilakari made the comments at a 'fringe' session
on organising at the Australian Council of Trade Unions Congress today (May
26).
The VTHC planned "to give every kid in high
school a union work card", Hilakari said, likening it to Commonwealth
Bank of Australia's successful 'Dollarmite' accounts targeting young school
children.
He said students could organise campaigns in their
schools like getting ethically-sourced chocolate in their canteens or
Textile Clothing and Footwear Union-approved school uniforms, which would
teach practical campaigning skills.
Hilakari also revealed a plan to target
youth-heavy industry sectors for organising and recruitment, such as
hospitality and retail sectors.
Workers in these sectors had industrial concerns
like being "paid in pizza" or below minimum wage, he said. "That's
a prime opportunity for us as organisers."
Hilakari said that VTHC had run sessions with
young workers to gauge their concerns and they had raised sexual harassment
in the workplace, being paid cash in hand and safety.
Hilakari championed the importance of data and
sharing of contact lists and petitions between unions. Having detailed
information about members' and workers' concerns allowed campaigners to
have an "authentic conversation" with voters about issues that
matter to them, he said.
Looking at petitions and sign-in sheets at union
events could help identify people who were passionate about union causes,
he said.
"If a member has filled in five or six
petitions – make them a delegate. If a non-member signs three or four
times, ask them to join the union."
Unions need
numbers not just strategy: delegate
Professionals' Australia chief executive Chris
Walton said the union movement must maintain focus on increasing numbers,
because "if you don't have adequate power, adequate numbers of
members, you can't win campaigns even if you get [everything else]
right".
"Do we just keep defensively running the next
state election campaign? Will the door to door [campaigning] model support
significant growth? I don't think the debate's been had adequately,"
Walton said.
He asked why the union movement was campaigning on
penalty rates "without [the campaign] being completely connected with
workers".
Even if organising and recruiting around this
campaign were unsuccessful, the movement would still appear "connected
to workers" and the debate would be framed "as a workers' issue,
not one about institutions and laws".
Walton said the union movement should focus on
workers it currently classes as too hard to organise, such as hospitality
workers.
"[Nobody is willing] to do a traditional
organising model in hospitality. But look at the overseas model, they've
organised workers in Walmart. Let's have a go," he said.
(Source:
Workforce Daily 19632, 26 May, 2015)
[9]
The decline of traditional employment
relationships due to digital disruption and globalisation has led to a
'trickle up' effect in wealth, according to Australian Council of Trade
Unions (ACTU) secretary Dave Oliver.
Oliver made the comments about growing income
inequality at the opening of the ACTU's triennial Congress today (May 26).
He reiterated his comments made in an interview to
Workforce
that the 'liquid workforce' created by digital platforms like Uber and
Freelancer was contributing to insecure work (WFD 25/06/15).
Working on these platforms was akin to 'zero hours
contracts' because they encouraged "a reverse auction where the lowest
bidder wins and the worker loses", he said.
Oliver warned of the emergence of "monolithic
empires" such as Google, Microsoft, and Apple which he said
"contributed to the rise in inequality".
He compared Sony, the $18bn technology business,
with Snapchat, the $19bn app-based photo sharing service. Sony, he said,
had "10,000s of employees" compared to Snapchat which could
"fit its entire operation under this one roof", of just 1,000
ACTU delegates.
Oliver said digital disruption and globalisation
were combining to cause a 'trickle up' effect - "more money at the
top, less at the bottom, and income not being distributed fairly".
Australia was now "11th most unequal of 34
OECD members", he said.
ACTU president Ged Kearney opened Congress with a
call for "a new social compact that delivers a fair distribution of
wealth for all Australians".
Kearney said workers are suffering under the
burden of "weak wage growth, longer commuter times, insecure work and
unemployment". "Wages' share of national income at close to
record lows," she said.
Kearney formally launched the ACTU's six point
charter of its 'Build a Better Future' campaign, which is centred around
improvements in the social wage including health, education, better public
services, secure retirement and a "fair go for all" in tax (WFD 25/06/15).
The charter was adopted unanimously by Congress
this morning.
(Source:
Workforce Daily 19632, 26 May, 2015)
[10]
The Vic Environment Protection Authority's powers
to ensure environmental justice principles are adhered to and "the
environment is protected for the benefit of the community" will come
under scrutiny in a new review.
Vic environment, climate change and water minister
Lisa Neville announced the inquiry last week, saying the relevant
legislation was almost 46 years old and the regulator needed to "keep
up with the times". The review would start in June and
report in March 2016, she said.
Former state justice department secretary Penny
Armytage will chair the review. Former 2009 Bushfires Royal Commission
CEO Jane Brockington and NT EPA non-executive director Janice Van
Reyk will join the review committee. Its terms of reference
include examining the scope and adequacy of the EPA's statutory powers; the
EPA's role in public health issues; community and industry expectations;
and its "appropriate" role in protecting the environment. Whether
the EPA's governance and funding allow it to "effectively and
efficiently" discharge its powers and perform its duties would be
studied.
(Source:
Environmental Manager 1002, 26 May 2015)
[11]
The Tas Government has appointed a new Environment
Protection Authority (EPA) director and three new board members, including
a new chair and deputy chair.
Former resources director at the state Department
of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE) Wes Ford
has been appointed as EPA director to replace retiring director Alex
Schaap. Ford has held several senior govt positions, most recently
AgriGrowth acting deputy secretary.
Warren Jones has been elevated to EPA chair
after serving as deputy chair since 2012. Jones was DPIPWE's
environment/EPA division GM. The new board deputy chair is Anthony Ferrier,
Kingborough Council's current deputy GM. Professor Colin Buxton, a former
director of the University of Tas's Fisheries, Aquaculture and Coasts
Centre was appointed to the EPA board. He joins new member Catherine
Murdoch, Tasmanian Irrigation Pty Ltd environment manager.
(Source:
Environmental Manager 1002, 26 May 2015)
[12]
Federal environment minister Greg Hunt has asked
the Qld Government to produce an environmental impact statement (EIS) to
support its plan to dump dredge material from its Abbot Point Port's
expansion proposal on industrial land next to an existing coal terminal (EM
31/03/15, 29/04/14).
Renamed the "Abbot Point growth gateway
project", the new Qld Govt wants to dispose of project dredge material
on unused industrial land instead of on nearby protected wetlands or
undersea within the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) marine park, as the former
state govt had proposed and the Federal Govt had approved.
Hunt on May 14 decided
he would assess the proposal by an EIS under the federal Environment
Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act. That was despite a new
bilateral agreement with Qld under s45 of the EPBC Act allowing the state
govt to assess development projects on the Federal Govt's behalf.
The new Qld Govt's coal terminal expansion project
would dredge about 61ha of seabed within the port's limits, outside the GBR
park, it said. It would increase the port's capacity to handle coal exports
from 50m to 120m tonnes a year to cater for planned Galilee Basin coal
exports, including Adani Mining Pty Ltd's proposed $16.5m Carmichael Mine.
"The full cost of the EIS will be paid for by
mine proponent, Adani, not taxpayers, under an agreement with the
govt," Qld state development minister Dr Anthony Lynham said.
Meantime, the legality of Hunt's 2014 approval for the Carmichael mine is
being challenged for a third time in the Qld Land Court (EM
20/01/15).
In a statement
of reasons, Hunt said he'd reviewed Qld Govt advice and found the project
"was not eligible" to be assessed under the bilateral agreement.
Given that, plus a lack of detail on the project's final design and
mitigation measures, and uncertainty about "the nature and scale"
of its impact on matters of national environmental significance (the GBR
world heritage protected area) Hunt said he'd accepted advice he assess it
with an EIS. He agreed, "in particular" with his
"department's view assessment by EIS would provide a robust and
thorough assessment … and the opportunity for public engagement" to
help him make an informed decision on whether to allow the port's expansion
to proceed.
GBR reg change
to formalise dredge backflip
Hunt's decision (above)
was a backflip on his October 2014 decision to not require an EIS
for dredge material to be disposed on Canley Vale wetlands next to the GBR
marine park. It triggered a Federal Court challenge during which Hunt
promised the court he would provide one days' warning to the Qld
Environment Defenders Office of any decision on the former Qld Govt's
project application. (EM
20/01/15).
But on May 17, Hunt said he'd
"formally approved" an amendment to GBR regulations to prevent
any dredge material being disposed "in the entire 344,400km2
park". "This covers 100% of the area under Commonwealth
legislative control and 99% of the world heritage area." The Qld Govt
had committed to a dredge disposal ban in the remaining 3,000km2
area under its jurisdiction which included port areas, he said. The
regulatory change has yet to be registered.
Hunt's GBR protection decisions precede a UNESCO
World Heritage Committee (WHC) decision on whether to list the GBR world
heritage area as "in danger" at a meeting in June.
(Source:
Environmental Manager 1002, 26 May 2015)
[13]
It's been proposed nine carbon farming initiative
(CFI) determinations covering agriculture, vegetation management &
landfill and alternative waste treatment be updated and shifted to the
emissions reduction fund (ERF) from July 1.
Methodology determinations on using covered
anaerobic ponds and engineered biodigesters to destruct methane generated
from dairy cow manure and piggeries are among those targeted. So too are
determinations on reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, managing
regrowth of native forests, measurement-based methods for new farm forestry
plantations, sequestering carbon in soils and using environmental or mallee
plantings for reforestation.
The federal environment department last week sought
submissions by June 2 on its proposals to update CFI
"transitioning methods". It would ensure all transitions methods
"are consistent with the ERF legislation, easy to use and more
streamlined", the dept said. The proposals were foreshadowed in an
energy white paper before the Federal Government's first auction of
Australian carbon credit units in April.
A draft explanatory statement
issued under environment minister Greg Hunt's authority said the carbon
credits (CFI-ERF) methodology determination variation
2015 would make "minor" amendments. The dept consulted the Clean
Energy Regulator in developing the variation.
Proposed amendments were "primarily" to
ensure CFI determinations continued to operate as "originally
intended" in light of changes made to the Carbon Credits (CFI) Act
2011, the statement said. They were also aimed at ensuring there were
"no unintended consequences for eligible offsets projects wanting to
apply the determinations".
It's proposed 17 other CFI determinations will be revoked
because new methods covering the same activities have
"superseded" them. The dept said existing projects "will not
be affected or disadvantaged". Projects could continue to use methods
in place when they were registered or transition to a new method "if
more advantageous".
(Source:
Environmental Manager 1002, 26 May 2015)
[14]
Campaigners employed by the Australian Council of
Trade Unions (ACTU) for its federal election push will stay on to help
affiliates organise their own campaigns around industrial matters, ACTU
secretary Dave Oliver has revealed.
The ACTU Congress today (May 27) unanimously
approved a $13m budget for its 'Build a Better Future' campaign, which will
target 30 marginal electorates and hire 21 campaigners. $10.8m of the $13m
will be funded by a permanent $2 per member levy on affiliates.
Oliver said the ACTU campaign unit would shrink to
14 campaigners in the 18 months after the election, but the peak body would
maintain a "permanent campaigning capacity".
"We have a federal election, three state
elections and two territory elections [in the next three years] … it
doesn't make sense to keep ramping up and ramping down campaigns," he
said.
Oliver said the ACTU would mobilise the unit to
organise affiliates' campaigns around industrial matters.
"They are notionally based in marginal seats,
but we want a mobile and nimble nation-wide campaigning team," he
said.
Oliver told Workforce
Daily the campaigners would help affiliates on industrial
matters like the Transport Workers Union's 'Safe Rates' campaign, but not
industrial disputes.
After the election, the ACTU campaign team would
"aim to achieve key advancements for working people such as secure
jobs and portable entitlements", Oliver said.
The campaign will be paid for by a $2 levy on top
of the $3.71 ACTU fee paid by affiliates for each member.
From 2016, the $2 levy will be built into the
affiliation fee as a "minimum guaranteed campaign" contribution.
Affiliation fees, including the levy, will
increase to $5.88 in 2017 and $6.05 in 2018.
Local
resourcing the focus of $13m spend
Oliver said the campaign will be ready to roll out
by the end of June, in the event the Abbott government calls an early
election.
The ACTU would focus its efforts on data, such as
aggregating and updating union lists, social media engagement with voters,
and ground resources like field campaigners and door-knocking. None of the
$13m will pay for national TV advertising, despite that being the
"most significant spend" in the successful Your Rights At Work
campaign in 2007, Oliver said.
Instead the ACTU would do "low level ads
online, on local TV and radio", he said.
Oliver said he hoped "in the cut and thrust
of the federal election there will be affiliates who donate resources to
run [national] TV ads", as occurred on a state-wide level in the Vic,
Qld and NSW state polls.
ACTU could go
further: Professionals Australia
Professionals Australia chief executive Chris
Walton spoke in favour of the motion, but said the ACTU should consider
raising a $5 levy to achieve an ever greater increase in its capacity.
Walton said although unions would "always
have to bargain" for their members "if we really want to help
[members] and not just negotiate redundancies, we have to shape the
environments in which they work".
The ACTU could work at an industry and national
level to effect changes to govt funding and legislation, he said.
"We need this to win in our industry
campaigns, not just deal with the symptoms."
"I don't support this resolution [because it
is] for an election campaign but because we are building a capacity to win
for you," Walton said.
He said the ACTU benefited its affiliates through
running campaigns on equal pay, minimum wage cases, giving information on
legal and economic changes and training unionists.
The ACTU should do more, including
"bargaining for us together" on expenses like phones and cars,
Walton said.
"We'd save more than $2 a member if we acted
on this novel concept called collective bargaining," he said.
(Source:
Workforce Daily 19633, 27 May, 2015)
[15]
Australia needs to prepare for the jobs of the
future as it confronts the risk of automation of low-wage sectors,
opposition leader Bill Shorten has said.
Shorten made the comments in an address to the
Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) Congress today (May 27).
He criticised the view that high wages made
Australia less competitive, and warned that "low wage jurisdictions
will be replaced by automation".
"We have to be the country which designs,
builds and operates the machines," he said.
Australia should prepare for "jobs which
haven't yet been developed" because "three out of four jobs in
the fastest growing industries will need skills in science, technology,
engineering and maths", he said.
"Labor has a plan to put these skills front
and centre – we want more Australians to study coding and computational
languages."
Shorten said the country faces "massive
change" as $100bn of mining investment has dried up and Australia
needed to plan for future job growth.
However, he committed Labor to oppose "the
race to the bottom in terms of wages and conditions, which erodes the
safety net which makes this a great country".
Labor fights
against visa exploitation: Shorten
Shorten said Labor had put a submission to the
Fair Work Commission minimum wage case for the first time because it
recognised "the min wage is not too high, it's a fundamental driver of
dignity for people in this country".
He argued the govt was attempting to repair the
budget deficit through 'bracket creep', which he described as the
"stealthy invisible hand of inflation". "[The govt] puts its
hand into your pocket taking your wage increases as increased taxes,"
he said.
Shorten also promised Labor would "never sign
up for the exploitation of people on working visas, no matter what pressure
is put on us by the conservatives".
However, last week shadow treasurer Chris Bowen
announced Labor would support the Coalition's proposed 32.5% working
holiday visa tax from the first dollar earned.
That was despite the National Union of Workers
saying the tax would be like "pouring gasoline on a fire" by
providing a disincentive to pay the visa workers appropriately and
"dooming" them to a black market economy (WF 22/05/2015).
(Source:
Workforce Daily 19633, 27 May, 2015)
[16]
By
Professor Niki Ellis
Adjunct Professor, Institute for Safety,
Compensation and Recovery Research and Department of Epidemiology and
Preventive Medicine, Monash University
www.nikiellis.com.au
Twitter @ProfNikiEllis
Recently an organisation asked me to consider what
being a mentally healthy workplace might look like for them. It was a great
brief, they were up for it. I started by having a look at their business
strategy and found they were growing, planning to further develop their
leadership and workforce and IT platform to enable them to be competitive
and make the most of the opportunities they could see.
I then reviewed their current investment and
performance in health and safety and concluded that they were a strong
performer in the traditional health and safety model. By that I mean they
aimed for zero harm in relation to the prevention of injuries. They had
started a workplace health promotion program, but it was early days, and
quite a long way off best practice.
A team from Johns Hopkins recently described
best and promising practice as:
·
Health education
·
Supportive social
and physical environments
·
Integration with
HR, infrastructure and environmental health and safety
·
Links between HP
and related programs eg EAP.
And that it works if:
·
Goals are aligned
to business
·
Program design is
evidence-based
·
Theory-based
implementation
·
Ongoing evaluation
What they did have was R U OK, and a great start
on a health portal. Way to go.
Potential for
web-based interventions
In another project I am working on for the life
insurance industry we have done a rapid review on the management of
psychological claims.
The review found that with regard to treatment
there was huge potential with web-based interventions for mental health.
A Canadian case study illustrated the future with
a confidential web-based mental health self-management resource. This
allows someone to assess their own mental health, provides information on
treatment and rehabilitation, with supporting material for doctors and then
tools for tracking progress.
The resource was based on recent evidence-based
guidelines, and was being marketed to insurers and employers.
A proposal to
become a mentally healthy workplace
Meanwhile back in Australia, having assessed the
broader strategic environment and what programs were already in place
relevant to mental wellbeing; not just in health and safety and workplace
health promotion but also in HR more broadly (EAP, diversity strategy,
respectful workplace policy etc), I developed a proposal for becoming a
mentally healthy workplace.
This drew on two sources of information: Tony La
Montagne's model of an integrated approach to mental health in the
workplace; and Gloria Sorensen's conceptual model for an integrated
approach to the prevention of 'work-related injuries and illness and the
enhancement of overall workforce health and wellbeing'.
Tony La Montagne is at the University of Melbourne
and his model has four components:
·
Prevent harm from
psychosocial hazards
·
(using work to)
Promote positive mental wellbeing
·
Early detection
·
Manage illness and
minimise consequences.
Implementation
science is key
Sorensen (above)
is the Queen of the integrated approach to workplace health and safety. She
is the head of the Centre for Work, Health and Wellbeing at Harvard
University.
A colleague of La Montagne's told me the light
bulb went on for Sorensen when she was running Quit programs at a foundry,
and realised the uselessness of talking to workers about them giving up
cigarette smoking in an environment filled with toxic fumes. She
presented a generic conceptual model, drawing on implementation science,
with the following elements: context (external and organisation);
interventions, mediating factors in the work organisation or work
environment, mediating factors related to workers, expected early outcomes,
and then expected final outcomes, at the first international conference on
Total Worker Health, American for the integrated approach,
in October last year. (Selected papers from the conference can be
found here)
Drafting the
strategic direction
Using both frameworks I generated draft strategic
directions for this organisation, which essentially draw together and build
upon many different strands of activities already in existence across the
organisation, with the aim of assisting to deliver on the broader business
plan.
These included:
·
Work design and
re-design: Proposed as they were building a new IT platform, the idea is
that health and wellbeing becomes a consideration in that work. For
existing work process, suggested the addition of psychosocial hazards to
the existing risk management system, possibly by using the routine employee
opinion survey to collect information on the psychosocial working
environment and leadership performance.
·
Proposed the
concept of work-life balance as a great link between individual behavioural
change and work environment change. Could be a focus of communications on
the strategy.
·
Extension of a
middle management development program on mental wellbeing which had already
been developed and run out to some. This is key, if you ramp up
conversations about mental health in a workplace you need to be confident
middle management can deal with mental health issues, otherwise
you may see this reflected as an increase in stress claims.
·
Inclusion of
health and productivity, especially mental health, in review of the
leadership development program.
·
Continue to
develop the health portal in relation to mental wellbeing, noting evidence
of effectiveness of web-based self management support and improving mental
health literacy.
·
Streamlining business
metrics: Opportunity to ensure that relevant indicators for mental
wellbeing and their link to productivity are included.
I provided three options for the goal. The first
two were based on integrated thinking. One was very broad, an aim of
improving organisational performance through health. The second was more
tightly focussed – improving workforce capability and wellbeing by
including mental health considerations in the development of leadership,
systems and workforce. The third option was based on extending the
traditional model to better include mental health – that is to contribute
to achieving zero harm through programs aiming to minimise psychosocial
risks and to promote mental health (separately, as is the tradition).
Bravo to this organisation for taking this topic
seriously and giving it a good shake. They are in a good position to
succeed as they have a strong foundation in a high performing traditional
workplace health and safety program, and they are not unused to the concept
of psychosocial ergonomics.
There are benefits to be had for workers in terms
of improved health outcomes and benefits to employers in terms of
performance, presenteeism and absenteeism.
But it is going to take a lot more than asking R U
OK.
(Source:
Inside OHS 90, 28 May, 2015)
[17]
Disputes about compliance with work health and
safety laws and "operational practices" were not "bullying
conduct" which could be dealt with by a stop-bullying application, the
Fair Work Commission has found.
Andrew Gilbert was accused of bullying by
St John's Ambulance WA Ltd volunteer paramedics. St John's, his
employer, stood him down while it conducted an investigation.
Gilbert applied to FWC for a stop-bullying order
against an employee of St John's Ambulance.
Commissioner Danny Cloghan noted from Gilbert's
application he "disagrees with operational practices" of
St John's and had made allegations about its compliance with the
'Workplace Health and Safety Act'.
Cmr Cloghan noted Gilbert had mentioned the
alleged bully only in the fields to nominate the subject of the order, and
not in the "narrative" areas describing alleged bullying conduct.
The cmr said this was "notable" because
Gilbert had alleged bullying started in February 2011 and
continued until November 2014 and occurred "almost every
day".
The cmr found Gilbert was in "obvious
conflict" with St John's and volunteer paramedics which could be
resolved in "a number of ways".
"However, there is [an] incongruity … between
a dispute over operational practices and an application to the cmn alleging
bullying," he said.
Cmr Cloghan was satisfied the application was
"not the appropriate means to resolve the workplace conflict",
and dismissed it for having "no reasonable prospect of success".
(Andrew
Gilbert, PR567824,
27/05/2015)
(Source:
Workforce Daily 19634, 28 May, 2015)
[18]
Insurers have come under increasing criticism for
processing claims from the Nepal earthquake and aftershocks too slowly,
e-news source eKantipur.comsays.
Nepal's Insurance Board (IB) said insurers had settled only four to five
cases each since the April 25 quake although the regulator had
instructed them to pay compensation as soon as possible. Late last week, IB
said insurers had received more than 12,000 claims – most of which were for
homes, commercial goods, and motor vehicle accidents besides a few life
claims. IB director Raju Raman Paude said: "Companies have settled
very few claims for damage to [homes worth] more than Inr200,000
($A4,027)." A lack of surveyors had also slowed claims settlements,
private insurers said. Because of the manpower shortage, IB had allowed
insurers to hire Indian surveyors without its prior approval. Lumbini
General Insurance had only settled four vehicle cases and one accident of
544 claims received. According to a company source, most claims were linked
to bank loans and commercial damage plus a few home claims. Sagarmatha
Insurance had settled eight of 1,685 claims. Four were for damage to homes
and four for commercial goods. Deputy GM Chunky Chhetry said Sagarmatha had
not yet received estimates for big claims. He said: "The company has
received 60-70 claims for damage to vehicles, but no estimates have been
submitted for any of them."
Monitoring
teams put pressure on insurers
IB (above)
said it had deployed four monitoring teams last Friday (May 22) to pressure
insurers into settling claims early. The insurers blamed the delays on
policyholders' failure to bring paperwork; lack of preliminary estimates;
and difficulties contacting policyholders because of poor communications.
Nepal Insurance Company head of claims Madhusudan Khatri said his company
had started making payments of Inr50,000-200,000 based on surveyors'
reports. Nepal Insurance had received 950 claims and deployed 35 surveyors,
including Indians. Khatri said apart from an increasing claims number, many
had rushed to buy home insurance after the quake.
India's state-owned reinsurer GIC Re, which
expected to bear the brunt of the quake, anticipated claims worth $US160m
($A205m), according toThe Times
of India.
Ratings agency AM Best this week said the
quake's impact on GIC Re's A- rating was insignificant because the
insurer's Nepalese risk exposure was protected by its retrocession
arrangement through excess-of-loss cover.
(Source:
Cover Note Asia 150, 28 May 2015)
[19]
The Indian Government wants to significantly
increase the country's risk coverage to about 40-50% of the population – up
from 20% today, The
Times of Indiareports.
Indian finance minister Arun Jaitley last
week said plans under a landmark social security initiative introduced a
fortnight ago would drive the increased coverage. It was the first time an
Indian govt had set targets for three social security schemes, life,
accident and pensions. The schemes had nominal life premiums at Rs330
($A6.60) a year, and accident at Rs12, each providing Rs200,000 cover. The
schemes had been a "runaway success" since their launch and more
than 76m had opted in.
The vast majority of people (58m) had selected
accident policies, while 18m had bought life cover. Govt data showed
by May 20, Atal Pension Yojana had signed 78,600 additional
members. The govt acknowledged pensions would be the slowest-moving product
but life demand was expected to pick up in the coming weeks. About 11% of
India's population had pension plans and Atal wanted to "make India …
a far bigger pensioned society", Jaitley told a news conference.
He said the social security drive was a major govt initiative. Unlike past
govts, the Narendra Modi govt would not wait until the eve of elections to
push such policies, he said.
(Source:
Cover Note Asia 150, 28 May 2015)
[20]
China is likely to develop an insurance-linked
securities (ILS) market over the next three to five years, WillisResilience
magazine predicts.
China Insurance Regulatory Commission (CIRC) supported creating a
catastrophe bond market and ILS would be an attractive option for big
insurers and corporates with captives. Globally, the ILS market continued
to record greater than 20% compound annual growth, reaching a record
issuance level in 2014 of $US9bn ($A11.5bn). While CIRC had not commented
on any ILS market plans, Willis suggested the first application was likely
to use catastrophe bonds to offset risk exposures at China's big
state-owned insurers. CIRC had already signalled its plans to create a
catastrophe bond fund and discussions had started with the big insurers, eg
on how to define risk pools. "Offsetting catastrophe risk in such
pools will inevitably require issuance of multi-tranche catastrophe bonds
for different layers of risk," Willis said. The second application
could follow the current CIRC push for captives, by encouraging China's big
current and former state-owned enterprises to explore alternative risk
transfer strategies. Willis said clients were increasingly exploring
whether catastrophe options were available to manage those risks, eg
massive-scale mortality risk from farming and agriculture; pandemic disease
risk from big transport companies; and depopulation risks from utilities in
quake-affected areas.
(Source:
Cover Note Asia 150, 28 May 2015)
[21]
The Asean Insurance Council (AIC) has embarked on
a two-year master plan to drive the region's industry growth to 7% by 2020
– up from 2.4% in 2013 – under the Asean economic community (AEC) set to be
established by year-end, Malaysia's The
Sun Heraldreports.
AIC secretary-general Evalina Pietruschka said a strategic quality control
framework and benchmarked standards were strategies needed to encourage the
development of highly competent Asean talent in the sector. Speaking last
week in Kuala Lumpur to reporters at the sidelines of a roundtable
discussion on Asean talent, she said: "We … are aggressively
approaching universities to promote the insurance industry as a major
profession of choice. This requires a concerted effort by industry players."
The dialogue was organised to gather industry leaders; share best
practices; and discuss additional measures to ensure sustainable growth for
the industry. AEC is expected to generate a wide range of opportunities for
business and investment through removing trade barriers and tariffs across
all member countries (CN
30/04/15). Life Insurance Association of Malaysia's
Zaharudin Daud toldThe Sun Asean's
insurance protection rate was half the global average. "Closing the
gap would require the industry to pool its strength and expertise through
raising public awareness on insurance, capacity building and fostering
greater regional co-operation," he said.
(Source:
Cover Note Asia 150, 28 May 2015)
[22]
Asian operations continue to contribute strongly
to EU-based insurer Ageas's results. Its March quarter results show
Ageas Asia led group inflows, up 47% on 1Q14 to €6.6bn ($A9.2bn). Group
inflows increased 28% to €10bn. Asian net profit was up 51%, contributing
€58m to the group's €198m net profit, up 37%. Ageas Asia CEO Gary Crist
said all the region's entities had contributed strongly. Life profits were
up 58%, struck on inflows of €6.1bn, up 49%. Life new business premiums
grew strongly in agency and bank channels, up 47% to €3.9bn. Renewals
increased significantly, up 52% to €2.2bn. The general insurance (GI)
business recorded growth in motor and personal accident (PA). Hong Kong
recorded a $A17m net profit and €126m in inflows, up 15%. Higher sales
originated mainly in China and Thailand, driven by successful campaigns and
continued channel development, including increased agent numbers. China's
inflows increased 51% to €5.1bn, driven by new business, up 50% to €3.5bn.
Thailand's life inflows were up 45% to €645m, reflecting 34% new business
growth to €285m. Thai GI inflows were up 32% to €75m across all business
lines, specifically motor and PA, up 56%. In Malaysia, life inflows were up
15% to €142m while GI inflows grew 21% to €216m. India's inflows were up
61% to €71m.
(Source:
Cover Note Asia 150, 28 May 2015)
[23]
ASIC's north Qld home and contents policy
comparison website was unpopular with senior executives Asia Insurance Review interviewed
for its Australian country profile issue (CN
21/05/15). Steadfast CEO Robert Kelly said the site was
"cumbersome to use", so consumers would not persist. "People
look for price not advice on aggregator sites. They ask how much and what's
cheapest, not will I get full value on a claim," he said. Allianz GM
corporate affairs Nicholas Scofield said the site was a waste of space.
"It's telling people what they already know … premiums are really high
and it could potentially confuse people because the pricing will be
different when consumers actually go to an insurer." High-risk
insureds were likely to get higher quotes from insurers than ASIC site
suggestions "and that's not a great outcome". "People will
complain so it's not going to assist the industry's or the govt's
reputations." QBE EGM Tim Plant said aggregator sites did not always
explain product benefits. Consumers needed improved product understanding,
which "aggregator sites often do not provide".
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[24]
Steadfast's Kelly (above) wants a unified approach to the
industry's talent shortage. He said industry participants wanted talent for
themselves but not for the industry in general. "I feel sad when I see
there is no bipartisan approach. There are so many different areas in our
industry that are appealing [for job seekers]," he said. Allianz's
Scofield said the talent shortage was not insurmountable. "You've got
to make sure you have a pipeline of people to take over when others
retire." Zurich Australia general insurance CEO Daniel Fogarty said
ANZIIF research showed a significant skills shortage at the expert level
and some shortage at the mid-level. "We need to generate greater
awareness and insights into insurance as a career to people at university
level so it is in the back of an individual's mind even if they choose to
start their career in another industry, eg law," he said. Kelly said
insurance was not "sexy". "Law and accounting firms skim
schools and universities to get talent – the insurance industry has never
done that."
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[25]
Growth in cluster groups for brokers and
underwriting agencies is on big insurers' radars, AIR's profile (above) found.
Retiring Chubb CEO Mark Lingafelter said agencies' growth was
"significant". "The growth in agencies creates a competitive
threat. It raises the bar for a specialist company like Chubb to ensure we
deliver the right service proposition. Over the longer term there are
important questions on the overall expense load carried under the agency
model and the capital return that will be achieved through the
proliferation of agencies." Steadfast's Kelly (above) said agencies
had expertise and capacity in areas mainstream insurers "don't
necessarily want to support". He said Steadfast's purchase of more
agencies (CN
16/04/15) was "nothing new; we're just adding bows to
our quiver." Lingafelter said more brokers were operating as
authorised representatives (AR). "This is simply a choice. They weigh
up the costs and benefits and have elected to work within an AR network.
The model is clearly successful."
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[26]
Global insurer Hollard Investments BV is seeking
to raise $810-$985m from the float of its Australian arm Greenstone Ltd on
the ASX next month. The company filed the Greenstone prospectus
this week offering 398.6m shares at an indicative price of $2-$2.50 per
share. The IPO opens on June 2 and closes on June 10.
Shares will first trade on June 16. According to the prospectus,
Hollard and the Casey Trust would collectively hold 291.7-293.2m shares or
42-42.6% of the outstanding shares. They would enter into voluntary escrow
agreements for those shares until after the release of Greenstone's FY16
results. Hollard intends to be a long-term Greenstone shareholder.
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[27]
Jurisdictions may establish class action
lists with dedicated judges, Qld Supreme Court Justice David Boddice told
the Australian Insurance Law Association's Qld intensive in Brisbane. He
said NSW Chief Justice Tom Bathurst was reported saying it was
important class actions be overseen by judges with specific expertise. The
Federal Court was the class action "forum of choice". But steps
were being taken to give Qld a class action regime, perhaps by adopting the
Federal Court's class action rules. Qld had only representative actions,
which required all parties to have the same interest in the dispute and
therefore it was harder for parties to qualify. Justice Boddice said
Qld's lack of class action procedural rules meant many were lodged in NSW,
eg an action against the Qld Government alleging dam mismanagement during
the 2011 floods (CN
10/07/14). Justice Boddice said the rise in class
actions had occurred since the advent of litigation funders and
particularly since the High Court's 2006 Fostif
decision, which found third-party litigation funding was "not contrary
to public policy or an abuse of process, even though individual funding
arrangements may fall foul of those imperatives". He said
many personal injuries firms now focused on class actions because tort law
changes made injury claims more difficult to prosecute.
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[28]
"If you can't get indemnity under the policy,
the doctrine of utmost good faith (DUGF) is not going to deliver it to
you," Qld barrister Sandy Thompson told the AILA Qld intensive (above). Thompson
appeared for CGU in the Qld Supreme Court case Matton Developments Pty Ltd v CGU Insurance Ltd(CN
30/04/15). He said the unsuccessful insured had lodged an
appeal. Matton had accused CGU of breaching DUGF by not accepting the
insured's account of events when a crane's boom collapsed on a building
site. Justice Peter Flanagan said honesty was "a core
obligation" and DUGF required full and frank disclosure. But insurers
were not prevented from seeking proof if a claim raised suspicions. They did
not have to "coddle insureds", surrender commercial advantage or
put an insured's interests above their own. Thompson said Justice
Flanagan had found insurers were entitled to deny indemnity if
circumstances fell outside the insurable interest or exclusion clauses
applied. In Matton,
the crane driver gave evidence the crane was on a level surface when its
boom collapsed but a CGU expert's evidence said it was not. Justice
Flanagan found the driver's evidence was inconsistent. (Matton Developments Pty Ltd v CGU
Insurance Ltd (No 2) [2015], QSC 72,
15/04/2015)
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[29]
The ACT Appeal Court has found a civil servant
liable under the Civil Liability Act for $658,850 in negligence damages to
a staff member after failing to prove he had her consent to have sexual
intercourse with her during an interstate work conference. Expressed as
assault and battery, 38-year-old Sharon Whitehead claimed she had sustained
a personal injury in August 2007 because of Michael Moon's sexual
assault, which had caused her to lose her virginity. She claimed as a
result she had received treatment from a rape crisis centre and
psychologists and had been totally incapacitated for work from Aug 17,
2007, to June 10, 2008. Master David Harper, who has since
retired, had entered a judgment against Moon for $668,856, including
$10,000 for aggravated damages and costs. Moon appealed against that
decision, claiming among other things Master Harper had erred in finding he
did not have Whitehead's consent to sexual intercourse.
The court heard Whitehead had met Moon in 2005,
when they worked together at the Department of Immigration and
Multicultural Affairs. The following year, the pair engaged in sexual
activity short of intercourse. Whitehead left the same year to work at the
Department of Veterans Affairs. The pair met again in 2007, after Moon had
started working for the Child Support Agency and a few months later
Whitehead agreed to work at the agency under Moon's supervision but said
she did not want a sexual relationship with him. On Aug 13, the pair
travelled to Sydney to attend a two-day conference. They had agreed
beforehand to share a two-bedroom, two-bathroom apartment. It was
established on the first night the pair visited several sex shops in Oxford
St before returning to their apartment. Whitehall claimed Moon had entered
her bedroom without her permission and forced himself on her despite her
repeatedly telling him to "get out". Master Harper accepted
Whitehall's evidence.
In the Appeal Court, Chief Justice (CJ) Helen
Murrell and Justice John Burns said Moon was liable in battery
unless he proved on the balance of probabilities he had Whitehall's consent
to that contact. Justice Hilary Penfold agreed. They found Master
Harper had gone "beyond finding" Moon had failed to discharge
that onus. CJ Murrell and Justice Burns found Moon's appeal must
therefore fail and Justice Penfold agreed. They upheld Master Harper's
decision but set aside the $10,000 award of aggravated damages. (Moon v Whitehead [2015], ACTCA 17,
22/05/2015; Sharon Whitehead v Michael Moon [2013], ACTSC 243,
05/12/2015)
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[30]
IAG MD and CEO Mike Wilkins this week urged the
Australian business community to recognise and act on Asian growth
opportunities. Speaking in Melbourne at an American Chamber of Commerce
business briefing, Wilkins said IAG saw "enormous potential" in
Asia as it built its presence in the region. "We have set a target for
our collective Asian business to deliver a return on equity, before
regional support and development costs, of more than 15% by the end of
[FY17]," he said. IAG had well-performing businesses in Thailand and
Malaysia, developing businesses in India, China and Vietnam, and had
established a presence in Indonesia. "Through our experience to date,
we've witnessed first-hand the growing appetite from our Asian associates
for Aust investment and capabilities and we encourage other businesses to
understand and act on the region's potential," Wilkins said.
"Should further attractive investment opportunities present
themselves, we would be prepared to expand our presence and investment in
the region."
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[31]
ASIC has banned Brett O'Malley, of Sunshine Beach,
Qld, from giving financial services advice for five years after he engaged
in unauthorised discretionary trading on his clients' accounts and created
false records. He illegally invested on their behalf without their
instructions before each transaction. O'Malley was a Macquarie Equities Ltd
(MEL) representative from December 2009
to January 2013. ASIC said in a statement
it had acted on a MEL report and found O'Malley had engaged in
discretionary trading on nine client accounts contrary to MEL's prohibition
against it. O'Malley also breached financial services laws by
misrepresenting to those clients MEL had authorised him to operate
discretionary trading accounts. ASIC found O'Malley had created records on
clients' behalf falsely indicating he had given them advice before engaging
in unauthorised discretionary trading. MEL was conducting a review to
compensate O'Malley's clients for any losses he had caused as part of a
broader client remediation process. MEL had agreed to implement the review
in an enforceable undertaking ASIC had accepted in Jan 2013. O'Malley
has a right to appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for a review
of ASIC's decision.
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[32]
Tower has confirmed
plans to implement an on-market share buyback of up to $NZ34m ($A31.8m) or
up to 10% of its issued capital. The buyback follows a $NZ22.6m increase in
provisions after tax for costs associated with the Canterbury earthquakes (CN
07/05/13). The buyback news co-incided with Tower's release
of its 1H15 report, which showed a $NZ4.9m net loss because of the quakes'
impact. Gross written premium was up 4.9% on 1H14 to $NZ145.9m. Underlying
general insurance net profit after tax was strong – up 36.4% to $NZ17.9m.
Tower chair Michael Stiassny said the positive underlying results reflected
the industry backdrop of rising premiums and fewer big claim events. Tower
CEO David Hancock said: "We have been busy implementing our growth
strategy; transforming customer interactions to drive revenue and
efficiency; building our digital capability to take us into new
distribution channels; and increasing our very strong position in the
Pacific Rim."
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[33]
At its annual investor day this week in Melbourne,
Suncorp launched a $75m "optimisation" program aimed to deliver
$170m of efficiency benefits in FY18. CEO Patrick Snowball said the new
program completed a redesign of the group's operating system. The savings
included efficiencies in claims processing; motor vehicle repairs; home
repairs; procurement; technology; and business intelligence.
He said Suncorp had improved performance and
growth from its bank, life, commercial insurance and NZ businesses. "I
am confident as we maximise the value of our strategic assets and deliver
on the next wave of projects we will see Suncorp achieve a substantial
return on earnings above 10%." Snowball said Suncorp was in
"great shape" to hand over to incoming group CEO Michael Cameron
this year (CN
16/04/15).
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[34]
The Super Complaints Tribunal (SCT) received 2,724
phone inquiries in the March qtr, down 6.7% on the previous qtr.
Written complaints dropped 11.5% to 637. In its latest quarterly bulletin,
SCT said 62.8% of complaints were within its jurisdiction. Of those, administration
complaints were the biggest category at 43.5%; death benefit complaints
29.7%; and disability 20.8%.
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[35]
Greenstone (above)
is "well positioned in highly attractive insurance markets", its
prospectus's independent financial report says.
Greenstone claimed a top two market share in Australian direct life distribution
and a leading share in the Aust pet insurance distribution market.
Greenstone was remunerated through agency payments and administration fees.
All risks were underwritten by third-party insurers Hannover Re, Swiss Re
and Hollard Insurance. Proprietary term life, funeral and income protection
brands comprised Real Insurance, Guardian Insurance and Australian Seniors
Insurance Agency; affinity brands, Medibank, Woolworths and Ace Ltd;
proprietary pet brands, Real, Guardian and Prime Pet; and affinity pet
brand RSPCA. It sold third-party products, including health insurance,
through its Choosi comparison site. The report's proforma figures forecast
FY16 revenue of $293.2m, up 18% on FY15 forecasts; net profit after tax of
$90.3m, up 49.5%; gross written premium of $149.8m, up 15%; and a $70.4m
positive cash flow compared to a $10.5m negative cash flow in FY14. Among
possible risks to revenue and profitability, the report listed
lower-than-expected future cash receipts; cyber risk; heightened competition
from new or existing rivals, including comparison websites; and inability
to secure underwriting on acceptable terms or increased terms if any
carriers terminated their arrangements.
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[36]
Swiss Bank UBS AG will withdraw from its
Australian wealth-management business, leaving senior employees to strike
out on their own after a management buyout, Dow Jones Institutional Newsreports.
UBS global wealth management vice-chair Alain Robert said UBS had decided
to quit the Aust wealth-management operations because "substantial
changes" in regulatory and client requirements made it
"increasingly difficult to operate on a sustainable basis in
Australia". Mike Chisholm had stepped down as head of the Aust
business unit and established independently owned Crestone Wealth
Management with a group of former senior UBS advisers. Chisholm said almost
all the Aust UBS client advisers and senior management had indicated they
would join Crestone, which was expected to be operational in October.
"Our objective is to create Australia's first independent global
wealth manager," he said.
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[37]
The Australian insurance market is forecast to
grow by 7.6% a year over the next 15 years to a $41.3bn annual premium
income by 2029, according a Rice Warner market report
released this week. The report predicts the market structure will shift as
the retail channel grows its share from 65% to 75% and the wholesale share
shrinks from 35% to 25%. Direct life insurance was expected to grow faster
than the overall market.
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[38]
Bermuda-based PartnerRe has proceeded to seek
shareholder approval for its merger with Axis Capital while Exor remains
confident its improved offer from $US130 ($A168) to $US137.50 will
ultimately succeed (CN
14/05/15). Insurance blog Bermuda:Re+ILS
said the PartnerRe board this week agreed to negotiate with Exor to decide
whether its offer could be improved after securing a waiver from Axis.
After that, Exor notified PartnerRe it was prepared to start discussions
"once the [PartnerRe board] declares Exor's binding offer is
reasonably likely to be a 'superior proposal'". In response, PartnerRe
said Exor had effectively rejected the board's good faith offer to engage
in discussions on price and other terms. "We have made it very clear
Exor's price and terms are unacceptable," it said.
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[39]
A deal to cut the legislated 2020 renewable energy
target (RET) by 8,000GWh may yet fall apart over the Federal
Government insisting on listing native forest wood waste as a renewable
energy source in a Bill tabled this week.
The Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment Bill
(REE Bill) tabled on May 27 by environment minister Greg
Huntreflected bipartisan agreement on reducing the legislated target from 41,000GWh
to 33,000GWh. The Bill would axe the destabilising two-yearly reviews of
the RET scheme by the Climate Change Authority (CCA) and exempt
emissions-intensive, trade-exposed (EITE) industries from compliance with
the scheme, as Hunt agreed with Opposition climate change spokesperson Mark
Butler last week.
It would overturn Labor's 2011 change
to RET regulation 8, which removed native forest biomass as an eligible
energy source. But the Bill would also shift the regulation's definition of
eligible woody biomassinto the legislation, and significantly changed the
definition.
The explanation
of Hunt's Bill referred to the definition of eligible woody biomass as
"protections". It would introduce the term "ecologically
sustainable forest management principles" into the RET legislation. To
be eligible to earn renewable energy certificates under the RET the Bill
said the biomass must have been harvested primarily for a purpose other
than for biomass for energy. The biomass must be either a by- or waste
product of a govt-approved harvesting operation that meets a new
"high-value test", or a by-product of an operation based on
ecologically sustainable forest management principles. The harvesting
operation must be covered by a regional forest agreement or meet equivalent
ecologically sustainable forest management principles "to the
satisfaction of the minister", the explanatory memorandum said.
The REE Bill's new "high-value test"
would ensure the forestry operation's primary purpose was sawlog, veneer,
poles, pile, girder, carpentry or craft wood, or oil product production and
that it derived most of its financial value from those products.
Senators will
decide Bill's fate
The govt shifting the RET's legal definition of
woody biomass came as a surprise to many, including the clean energy
industry, after the drawn-out negotiations between the major parties meant
to seal a bipartisan deal on the scheme's future was finally forged last
week. Most had expected the govt would table a separate regulatory
amendment to reintroduce native-forest wood biomass into the RET.
The govt's move generated a clash between Labor
and Greens MPs. New Greens leader Senator Richard Di Natale demanded Labor
"abandon its deal to cut the RET, which was introduced to parliament
today and allows for the burning of native forests". Labor Opposition
climate change spokesperson Mark Butler rejected as "completely false
Di Natale's suggestion Labor's deal with the govt was designed to allow
native forest biomass back into the scheme in return for dropping the CCA's
biannual reviews. Labor "does not support burning native forests as a
renewable energy source" and would move to amend the Bill, Butler
said. "We opposed it in govt and we oppose it now," he said.
That means the Bill's fate rests on the govt
securing the needed Senate six cross-bench votes for it to pass as is.
Alternatively, the govt may be hoping Labor will cave into
industry and forestry union pressure and pass it without amendment, Carbon Extra sources
said. Hunt has not yet delivered the Bill's second reading and his office
has not responded to Carbon
Extra's question.
RET regs will
prevent EITE windfall, govt says
The Bill's (above)
100 exemption for EITEs from having to comply with the RET scheme would
introduce new electricity intensity baselines for EITE activities, the
explanatory memorandum said.
More flexible'
RET regulations
That created a risk some EITE
firms may receive "assistance that exceeds the cost impact
of the RET on these EITE activities". The govt would consult on the
detail of amended regulations "to address this risk", it said.
Therefore, the REE Bill (above)
would allow "more flexible" regulations "in terms of how
they may characterise or describe the amount of an exemption
certificate".
(Source:
Carbon Extra 319, 29 May 2015)
[40]
Clean Energy Regulator (CER) CEO Chloe Munro this
week confirmed most of the carbon abatement contracted after the first
emissions reduction fund (ERF) auction last month would come from projects
already operating under the former Federal Government's carbon farming
initiative (CFI).
The CER spent about $660m of the ERF's total
$2.55bn funds on the first auction, paying on average $13.95 per tonne/CO2-e
for a total of 47m tonnes of abatement.
Under questioning inSenator Estimates this week,
Munro said 107 of 144 projects underERF contracts had transitioned from the
CFI. The 34.4m tonnes of carbonabatement they would deliver represented 72%
of the total abatement contracted from the first auction, she said. The
remaining 37 projects were new. Opposition climate change spokespersonMark
Butler saidthatmeant the govt had effectivelypaid $66t/CO2-e for
"only 10m additional tonnes of carbon abatement".
(Source:
Carbon Extra 319, 29 May 2015)
[41]
Newly updated federal regulatory guidance takes
into account the "broader scope" of emissions reduction fund
(ERF) project types, new participants and "anticipated"
aggregated structures that "may emerge".
The Australian Securities & Investments
Commission's (ASIC) latest Regulatory Guide
236 (RG 236) also affirms who "may need" Aust financial services
licences (AFSLs) under the Federal Government's revised carbon markets
regime. In March, after negative reaction, the govt split its plans to
exempt some ERF participants from having to hold AFSLs (Carbon
Extra 20/03/15).
ASIC's updated RG 236, released
on May 20, confirmed Australian carbon credit units (ACCUs) and
eligible international emissions units (EIEUs) were financial products.
Providing information on ACCUs or EIEUs to another
person could constitute financial product advice in some circumstances, the
guide said. Eg, where the information was intended to influence their
decisions on regulated emissions units or "could reasonably be
regarded as being intended to have such an influence". Providing
financial product advice could relate to an ERF project or to people
seeking to produce EIEUs through developing or operating international
offset projects. It could include advice given to voluntary emissions
offsetters "on approaches to, or strategies for, acquiring or
disposing of regulated emissions units". Providing advice to entities
covered by the govt's proposed safeguard mechanism to help them make
decisions about acquiring or disposing of regulated emissions units could
also constitute financial product advice.
The guide noted other emissions-related financial
products included derivatives over emissions units and interests in managed
investment schemes involving carbon abatement activities or emissions
units. Carbon abatement contracts themselves were not financial products,
RG 236 said. That meant people did not require AFSLs to provide advice
about those contracts or deal in them.
ASIC in an online statement said
it had worked closely with the federal environment department and the Clean
Energy Regulator (CER) to "anticipate a variety of different
structures of ERF aggregated projects that may emerge". However,
ASIC said it would "monitor the need to more closely align its
guidance to emerging and evolving ERF practices".
Carbon
Extra sources say it's likely the next ERF auction, expected
later this year, will see bids based on the scheme's method for aggregated
energy efficiency projects. The legal technicalities, including ASIC's
final position on who needed AFSLs, had stalled market players forging the
multiple contracts involved in preparing aggregated projects for bid.
(Source:
Carbon Extra 319, 29 May 2015)
[42]
On Monday June 1, peak state union body
Unions NSW will protest outside federal Treasurer Joe Hockey's office
against govt cuts to paid parental leave. Unions NSW encouraged supporters
to bring "dummies" and their baby or toddler as part of the protest.
(Source:
Workforce NSW 19635, 29 May 2015)
[43]
AMP Capital CEO Stephen Dunne will retire this year.
AMP CEO Craig Meller
said in an ASX statement
Dunne had contributed substantially to the company since joining in 1994,
including the "long relationship" with China Life Insurance
Company ... Tower Ltd has appointed Vic Funds Management Corp CEO Warren Lee an
independent non-executive director. He is a former Axa Asia Pacific
Holdings Ltd CEO.
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
Jack
Howell has been appointed to replace Sergio Di Caro as
Generali Group Asia regional officer, responsible for China, Hong Kong,
India, Indonesia, Japan and the Philippines.
(Source:
Cover Note Asia 150, 28 May 2015)
[44]
July
22, Sydney: AILA twilight seminar: An update on ASIC's
regulatory priorities. Go to www.aila.com.au/events
August
5, Sydney: AILA twilight seminar: Good faith and claims
handling. Go to www.aila.com.au/events
August
5-6, Sydney: AICLA/ANZIIF 2015 claims convention. Go to theinstitute.com.au
(Source:
Cover Note 1915, 28 May 2015)
[45]
Managing
Editors: Helen Jones, Peter Schwab. Emailhelen.jones@thomsonreuters.com
or peter.schwab@thomsonreuters.com.
|