From: eNews, LTA ANZ
Sent: Friday, 29 May 2015 5:28 PM
To: Jones, Helen (Legal)
Subject: Executive Compliance News Manufacturing 233: RET Bill politicking goes on; Canterbury Windows locked out 50 workers; More...
The trade union movement looks set to ramp up its campaign on paid parental leave (PPL), with an Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) draft policy document demanding government-funded PPL be boosted to 26 weeks and employers be required to supplement it with their own schemes.
The May 7 draft policy paper, obtained by Workforce ahead of the ACTU triennial Congress next week, would commit the peak union body to lobby for:
· a govt-funded PPL scheme of 26 weeks paid "at no less than the national minimum wage plus superannuation"; and
· a "mandated top-up of the govt scheme to full wage replacement to ensure a co-contribution from employers".
On May 12, Treasurer Joe Hockey announced the govt would prevent parents accessing both the govt and employer PPL schemes, which other senior ministers described as 'double-dipping' (WF 15/05/15).
Unions will also "campaign and bargain for an increase to the 'dad and partner pay scheme' to provide eligible employees with four weeks leave rather than two", the policy document said. They will push for the accrual of entitlements including payment of public holidays and employer super contributions during periods of paid and unpaid parental and carers' leave.
Strengthen bullying and adverse action claims
The ACTU document proposes extending the Fair Work Commission's (FWC) jurisdiction to issue stop-bullying orders to "all workers, not just those employed by constitutional corporations". Unions should be able to apply to stop "systemic bullying rather than the sole focus on individual complaints required to be made public", it said. The ACTU proposed removing the "reasonable management action taken in a reasonable manner" defence to bullying claims. It argued the defence was "a means for employers to cover workplace bullying".
It also wanted to reinstate the "essentially beneficial and protective operation of the general protections provisions of the FW Act" through either:
· a positive description of the relevant test of characterisation as an objective test; or
· excluding the "purely subjective approach" to ascertaining the reasons for adverse action.
The proposal responds to union fears courts are in effect allowing decision-makers' evidence they did not take adverse action for a prohibited reason to determine claims, after employer wins in the High Court's BHP Coal (WF 17/10/14) and Barclay v Bendigo TAFE (WF7/09/2012).
Regulate labour hire and supply chains: ACTU
The draft policy document called for FW Act amendments "to facilitate and support parties negotiating arrangements which have industry-wide or supply chain impact".
"In particular, Congress is concerned to ensure collective agreements can cover labour hire workers who are economically dependent servants and agents of an entity with which they have no 'employment relationship'," it said.
The document backed "enterprise bargaining across an industry or supply chain" as "more reflective of the modern organisation of industries operating on the basis of joint production and joint employment".
It proposed "the establishment of a comprehensive national scheme for the registration, licensing and regulation of labour hire agencies". In addition, unions should have "unrestricted" rights to represent independent contractors. The current system requires Australian Competition and Consumer Commission approval for independent contractors to collectively bargain. The ACTU proposed banning enterprise agreements (EAs) which "cover only one employee" and EAs "made with a small number of employees prior to the engagement of the rest of the workforce".
More worker protections needed for strikes
The ACTU paper (above) called for more protections for workers involved in strikes, ie:
· removing the secondary boycott provisions of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010;
· requiring employers to give "three clear working days' written notice" of a lockout; and
· ensuring employer response action "must be a "proportional response" to employees' protected action.
Lift good faith bargaining requirements
The ACTU document proposed higher standards for good faith bargaining including:
· requiring employers to disclose relevant and material information to bargaining parties in a timely manner, while ensuring genuinely confidential information is "treated appropriately";
· requiring the employer's "principal decision-maker" to participate in bargaining;
· prohibiting employers from submitting an agreement to a vote until the bargaining representatives are agreed a course or bargaining is at an impasse; and
· promoting a "normal expectation" that bargaining parties should reach an agreement unless there are genuine reasons based on reasonable grounds not to do so.
'Last resort' arbitration for FWC
· FW Act amendments to empower FWC "to arbitrate disputes about any matters arising under awards, agreements or the NES, as a last resort"; and
· FW Act and state referral legislation amendments to expressly permit the federal system, including the FWC, "to deal with all public sector employment matters that state govts have argued are subject to constitutional limitations, such as job security and staffing levels".
Unions to campaign on youth super
The draft document proposes an ACTU campaign to "expand the superannuation guarantee to workers under the age of 18, and remove the discriminatory requirement that workers under 18 must work at least 30 hours per week to receive employer super contributions".
Other youth-oriented policies included:
· opposition to unpaid internships that are not part of an accredited course; and
· a resolution "to explore and support new organising strategies, particularly those that integrate technology with campaigning".
FEG, modern award review and IFA changes
The ACTU also proposed campaigning to ensure:
· all employee entitlements, including deductions, are fully recoverable from the Fair Entitlements Guarantee (FEG);
· abolition of compulsory four yearly reviews of modern awards; and
· abolition of individual flexibility agreements (IFAs).
(Source: Workforce 19625, 22 May, 2015)
The Federal Government will "partner with Australia's largest employers to help increase their average Indigenous employment rate to at least 3% of their workforces by 2020", assistant employment minister Luke Hartsuyker has announced. Its Employment Parity Initiative will target an extra 20,000 Indigenous Australians in jobs within five years by supporting private sector employers such as Accor Hotel Group and Compass Group Aust. Talking to the May 20 Indigenous Employment Conference, Hartsuyker said this was on top of the Commonwealth public sector target of "increasing its Indigenous workforce to 3% by 2018, which means an extra 7,500 people". Hartsuyker said the Govt's aim of having 3% of C'wealth procurement contracts with Indigenous suppliers by 2020 would boost its current value of $6.2m to some $135m a year. By supporting Indigenous business that should also boost Indigenous employment, he said.
"As at 31 March 2015, there were around 78,000 Indigenous job seekers on the Job Services Australia caseload, around 9% of the total caseload. Of these, 65% were in the most disadvantaged streams in Job Services Australia (JSA) - compared to 38% of all job seekers," he said. He said JSA fees have been restructured around job retention with "new outcome payments at 4, 12 and 26 weeks". "For the first time, there will be Indigenous Outcome Targets, to ensure jobactive (the employment services model replacing JSA July 1) providers are achieving job outcomes for Indigenous job seekers at the same rate as other job seekers in their region."
(Source: Discrimination Alert 470, 25 May, 2015)
An employer springing a disciplinary meeting on an employee was a "threatening" rather than a reasonable management action, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) has found.
Despite the ambush, FWC refused a stop-bullying order because the employer dealt with the probationary employee fairly after the incident and in the face of the worker's inflammatory emails calling for the dismissal of his alleged persecutors.
Radiologist James Willis complained that on May 30, 2014 the general manager and human resources manager of his employer Capital Radiology Pty Ltd held a disciplinary interview with him without notice.
He said the GM "unreasonably berated him" while the HR manager "demonstrated amusement at his predicament".
Willis sought stop-bullying orders against his employer and the two managers.
Capital Radiology had lost a bid to have the application dismissed after Commissioner John Lewin rejected its claim the meeting was reasonable management action (WF 20/02/15).
Employer patient in face of worker's inflammatory emails
In the substantive decision, Cmr Lewin said the meeting without warning was "unreasonable action carried out in an unreasonable manner".
Willis was "subject to severe criticism based on complaints by a person employed by a different entity", he said. This would have been "threatening", especially seeing as Willis had only recently started work and was on probation.
The cmr said a reasonable course of action would have been to advise Willis of the meeting and its purpose and then explain expectations about his performance.
Capital Radiology engaged in "repeated unreasonable behaviour" by starting a disciplinary process which "risked injury of Willis' psychological health and wellbeing", he said.
Cmr Lewin noted Willis' relationship with Capital Radiology had become "very strained" and Willis had brought Federal Circuit Court proceedings against it for alleged "breaches of his workplace rights".
But the cmr found that since Capital Radiology withdrew notice of the disciplinary process it had not taken any further unreasonable actions and had kept the two managers away from Willis.
The employer handled the matter with "restraint and patience" and showed "careful attention to procedural fairness" while Willis was now stood down with pay, he said.
Willis, on the other hand, "has not been fully cooperative" and had sent "inflammatory emails" which made "serious allegations" against the two managers, demanding their dismissal and giving "derogatory descriptions" of their character.
Cmr Lewin held in light of Capital Radiology's "fair procedure" he was not satisfied there was any risk of bullying to Willis, and dismissed the application.
(James Willis v Marie Gibson; Capital Radiology; Peita Carroll , FWC 3538, 22/05/2015)
(Source: Workforce Daily 19631, 25 May, 2015)
Victoria Trades Hall Council (VTHC) secretary Luke Hilakari has revealed a plan to target school children for union membership and organise young workers in hospitality and retail industries.
Hilakari made the comments at a 'fringe' session on organising at the Australian Council of Trade Unions Congress today (May 26).
The VTHC planned "to give every kid in high school a union work card", Hilakari said, likening it to Commonwealth Bank of Australia's successful 'Dollarmite' accounts targeting young school children.
He said students could organise campaigns in their schools like getting ethically-sourced chocolate in their canteens or Textile Clothing and Footwear Union-approved school uniforms, which would teach practical campaigning skills.
Hilakari also revealed a plan to target youth-heavy industry sectors for organising and recruitment, such as hospitality and retail sectors.
Workers in these sectors had industrial concerns like being "paid in pizza" or below minimum wage, he said. "That's a prime opportunity for us as organisers."
Hilakari said that VTHC had run sessions with young workers to gauge their concerns and they had raised sexual harassment in the workplace, being paid cash in hand and safety.
Hilakari championed the importance of data and sharing of contact lists and petitions between unions. Having detailed information about members' and workers' concerns allowed campaigners to have an "authentic conversation" with voters about issues that matter to them, he said.
Looking at petitions and sign-in sheets at union events could help identify people who were passionate about union causes, he said.
"If a member has filled in five or six petitions – make them a delegate. If a non-member signs three or four times, ask them to join the union."
Unions need numbers not just strategy: delegate
Professionals' Australia chief executive Chris Walton said the union movement must maintain focus on increasing numbers, because "if you don't have adequate power, adequate numbers of members, you can't win campaigns even if you get [everything else] right".
"Do we just keep defensively running the next state election campaign? Will the door to door [campaigning] model support significant growth? I don't think the debate's been had adequately," Walton said.
He asked why the union movement was campaigning on penalty rates "without [the campaign] being completely connected with workers".
Even if organising and recruiting around this campaign were unsuccessful, the movement would still appear "connected to workers" and the debate would be framed "as a workers' issue, not one about institutions and laws".
Walton said the union movement should focus on workers it currently classes as too hard to organise, such as hospitality workers.
"[Nobody is willing] to do a traditional organising model in hospitality. But look at the overseas model, they've organised workers in Walmart. Let's have a go," he said.
(Source: Workforce Daily 19632, 26 May, 2015)
The decline of traditional employment relationships due to digital disruption and globalisation has led to a 'trickle up' effect in wealth, according to Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) secretary Dave Oliver.
Oliver made the comments about growing income inequality at the opening of the ACTU's triennial Congress today (May 26).
He reiterated his comments made in an interview to Workforce that the 'liquid workforce' created by digital platforms like Uber and Freelancer was contributing to insecure work (WFD 25/06/15).
Working on these platforms was akin to 'zero hours contracts' because they encouraged "a reverse auction where the lowest bidder wins and the worker loses", he said.
Oliver warned of the emergence of "monolithic empires" such as Google, Microsoft, and Apple which he said "contributed to the rise in inequality".
He compared Sony, the $18bn technology business, with Snapchat, the $19bn app-based photo sharing service. Sony, he said, had "10,000s of employees" compared to Snapchat which could "fit its entire operation under this one roof", of just 1,000 ACTU delegates.
Oliver said digital disruption and globalisation were combining to cause a 'trickle up' effect - "more money at the top, less at the bottom, and income not being distributed fairly".
Australia was now "11th most unequal of 34 OECD members", he said.
ACTU president Ged Kearney opened Congress with a call for "a new social compact that delivers a fair distribution of wealth for all Australians".
Kearney said workers are suffering under the burden of "weak wage growth, longer commuter times, insecure work and unemployment". "Wages' share of national income at close to record lows," she said.
Kearney formally launched the ACTU's six point charter of its 'Build a Better Future' campaign, which is centred around improvements in the social wage including health, education, better public services, secure retirement and a "fair go for all" in tax (WFD 25/06/15).
The charter was adopted unanimously by Congress this morning.
(Source: Workforce Daily 19632, 26 May, 2015)
The Vic Environment Protection Authority's powers to ensure environmental justice principles are adhered to and "the environment is protected for the benefit of the community" will come under scrutiny in a new review.
Vic environment, climate change and water minister Lisa Neville announced the inquiry last week, saying the relevant legislation was almost 46 years old and the regulator needed to "keep up with the times". The review would start in June and report in March 2016, she said.
Former state justice department secretary Penny Armytage will chair the review. Former 2009 Bushfires Royal Commission CEO Jane Brockington and NT EPA non-executive director Janice Van Reyk will join the review committee. Its terms of reference include examining the scope and adequacy of the EPA's statutory powers; the EPA's role in public health issues; community and industry expectations; and its "appropriate" role in protecting the environment. Whether the EPA's governance and funding allow it to "effectively and efficiently" discharge its powers and perform its duties would be studied.
(Source: Environmental Manager 1002, 26 May 2015)
The Tas Government has appointed a new Environment Protection Authority (EPA) director and three new board members, including a new chair and deputy chair.
Former resources director at the state Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (DPIPWE) Wes Ford has been appointed as EPA director to replace retiring director Alex Schaap. Ford has held several senior govt positions, most recently AgriGrowth acting deputy secretary.
Warren Jones has been elevated to EPA chair after serving as deputy chair since 2012. Jones was DPIPWE's environment/EPA division GM. The new board deputy chair is Anthony Ferrier, Kingborough Council's current deputy GM. Professor Colin Buxton, a former director of the University of Tas's Fisheries, Aquaculture and Coasts Centre was appointed to the EPA board. He joins new member Catherine Murdoch, Tasmanian Irrigation Pty Ltd environment manager.
(Source: Environmental Manager 1002, 26 May 2015)
Federal environment minister Greg Hunt has asked the Qld Government to produce an environmental impact statement (EIS) to support its plan to dump dredge material from its Abbot Point Port's expansion proposal on industrial land next to an existing coal terminal (EM 31/03/15, 29/04/14).
Renamed the "Abbot Point growth gateway project", the new Qld Govt wants to dispose of project dredge material on unused industrial land instead of on nearby protected wetlands or undersea within the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) marine park, as the former state govt had proposed and the Federal Govt had approved.
Hunt on May 14 decided he would assess the proposal by an EIS under the federal Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act. That was despite a new bilateral agreement with Qld under s45 of the EPBC Act allowing the state govt to assess development projects on the Federal Govt's behalf.
The new Qld Govt's coal terminal expansion project would dredge about 61ha of seabed within the port's limits, outside the GBR park, it said. It would increase the port's capacity to handle coal exports from 50m to 120m tonnes a year to cater for planned Galilee Basin coal exports, including Adani Mining Pty Ltd's proposed $16.5m Carmichael Mine.
"The full cost of the EIS will be paid for by mine proponent, Adani, not taxpayers, under an agreement with the govt," Qld state development minister Dr Anthony Lynham said. Meantime, the legality of Hunt's 2014 approval for the Carmichael mine is being challenged for a third time in the Qld Land Court (EM 20/01/15).
In a statement of reasons, Hunt said he'd reviewed Qld Govt advice and found the project "was not eligible" to be assessed under the bilateral agreement. Given that, plus a lack of detail on the project's final design and mitigation measures, and uncertainty about "the nature and scale" of its impact on matters of national environmental significance (the GBR world heritage protected area) Hunt said he'd accepted advice he assess it with an EIS. He agreed, "in particular" with his "department's view assessment by EIS would provide a robust and thorough assessment … and the opportunity for public engagement" to help him make an informed decision on whether to allow the port's expansion to proceed.
GBR reg change to formalise dredge backflip
Hunt's decision (above) was a backflip on his October 2014 decision to not require an EIS for dredge material to be disposed on Canley Vale wetlands next to the GBR marine park. It triggered a Federal Court challenge during which Hunt promised the court he would provide one days' warning to the Qld Environment Defenders Office of any decision on the former Qld Govt's project application. (EM 20/01/15).
But on May 17, Hunt said he'd "formally approved" an amendment to GBR regulations to prevent any dredge material being disposed "in the entire 344,400km2 park". "This covers 100% of the area under Commonwealth legislative control and 99% of the world heritage area." The Qld Govt had committed to a dredge disposal ban in the remaining 3,000km2 area under its jurisdiction which included port areas, he said. The regulatory change has yet to be registered.
Hunt's GBR protection decisions precede a UNESCO World Heritage Committee (WHC) decision on whether to list the GBR world heritage area as "in danger" at a meeting in June.
(Source: Environmental Manager 1002, 26 May 2015)
It's been proposed nine carbon farming initiative (CFI) determinations covering agriculture, vegetation management & landfill and alternative waste treatment be updated and shifted to the emissions reduction fund (ERF) from July 1.
Methodology determinations on using covered anaerobic ponds and engineered biodigesters to destruct methane generated from dairy cow manure and piggeries are among those targeted. So too are determinations on reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, managing regrowth of native forests, measurement-based methods for new farm forestry plantations, sequestering carbon in soils and using environmental or mallee plantings for reforestation.
The federal environment department last week sought submissions by June 2 on its proposals to update CFI "transitioning methods". It would ensure all transitions methods "are consistent with the ERF legislation, easy to use and more streamlined", the dept said. The proposals were foreshadowed in an energy white paper before the Federal Government's first auction of Australian carbon credit units in April.
A draft explanatory statement issued under environment minister Greg Hunt's authority said the carbon credits (CFI-ERF) methodology determination variation 2015 would make "minor" amendments. The dept consulted the Clean Energy Regulator in developing the variation.
Proposed amendments were "primarily" to ensure CFI determinations continued to operate as "originally intended" in light of changes made to the Carbon Credits (CFI) Act 2011, the statement said. They were also aimed at ensuring there were "no unintended consequences for eligible offsets projects wanting to apply the determinations".
It's proposed 17 other CFI determinations will be revoked because new methods covering the same activities have "superseded" them. The dept said existing projects "will not be affected or disadvantaged". Projects could continue to use methods in place when they were registered or transition to a new method "if more advantageous".
(Source: Environmental Manager 1002, 26 May 2015)
Transpacific Industry Pty Ltd faces paying $363,000 for occupational health and safety (OHS) breaches plus costs in a prosecution result Comcare has labelled a "first" on two fronts.
In a May 22 media statement, Comcare said the penalty was the largest against an employer "as a result of a single court proceeding" by the regulator. It was "also the first time" multiple breaches of Commonwealth work health and safety laws "have been found against an employer in regard to an ongoing risk to health and safety", Comcare said.
Earlier on May 22, Federal Court Justice Michael Barker held Transpacific liable for two civil financial penalties after a fatal incident in Perth in February 2011 and subsequent truck safety maintenance system failures in April and May 2011. He said Comcare and Transpacific had agreed on a declaration for two OHS breaches in each of four time periods. But they disagreed on the range and number of penalties that should be imposed. Comcare had sought four separate penalties at the "upper end of the range". Conversely, Transpacific had contended the "objective seriousness" of its offending should be considered at the "lower end of the range" and that the financial penalty imposed "should reflect that". Transpacific said its conduct on Feb 28, April 2-19, April 21-May 8 and May 10-13, 2011, was "quite clearly" the same as it failed to "do the same things". It had taken steps to prevent further contraventions since the events subject to the proceedings.
Comcare lodged the single court proceeding in December 2013, 22 months after a Transpacific Cleanaway garbage truck collided with a Ford van then a Kia Rio wagon in Caversham (OHN 22/01/14). Wagon driver Mary Louise Ross, 71, died as a result of injuries she sustained and van driver Susan Michelle McMerrin was injured. Justice Barker said McMerrin wasn't seriously injured but suffered ongoing neck pain. Transpacific owns the Cleanaway business and the Iveco Acco truck that was serviced seven days before the Feb 28, 2011, collision. The company admitted the "substance" of Comcare's case but raised issues of fact. That was after it initially filed and served a defence on Feb 21, 2014, in which it denied alleged breaches of the OHS Act 1991. Three mediations in April, September and November 2014 preceded an agreed statement of facts between the company and Comcare. The statement said Transpacific employee driver Aaron Meotti applied the truck's brakes after a sedan travelling in front of him "swung around very quickly and, without warning or indicating", veered to the left of the road to pass the stationary Ford van. Meotti when he saw the van believed there was insufficient room for him to pass the van safety on its left without colliding with a light pole and a stabiliser post that supported a second pole. He immediately applied the service brakes and the truck's four rear wheels "locked up" and stopped rotating. The two front wheels did not lock up and the truck skidded before colliding with the van's right-hand rear corner and continued to skid into the lane of oncoming traffic where it hit the front right-hand corner of Ross's wagon. The truck skidded a total 60m before it hit the wagon.
Brake defects not identified
Justice Barker said Meotti was driving the truck at 65-70kph on part of West Swan Road that had a 70kph speed limit. He was driving the truck about two car lengths behind the sedan that was travelling at about the same speed. Meotti was not charged with any offence arising from the incident. Transpacific had Meotti assessed by a doctor before giving him two weeks' leave from work. On his return it paired Meotti with another driver for several days before he resumed normal duties. Transpacific accepted the brake defects existed on Feb 28, 2011, but submitted there was no evidence they were there when the truck was last serviced on Feb 21, seven days earlier.
Roadworthy despite brake troubles
The company (above) accepted three of its mechanics when separately servicing the truck on April 1 and 20 and May 9, 2011, didn't identify or rectify the brake defects. The three services were conducted on the truck after WA transport department vehicle examiners on March 28 passed it as a roadworthy, "although it still had the brake defects", after accident damage to its front was repaired. Justice Barker said the examiners "did not report the brake defects to Transpacific". On May 9, WA police informed Comcare the truck's front brakes had been defective at the time of the fatal incident. On May 13, Comcare issued an improvement notice to Transpacific requiring it to ensure all brakes on its heavy vehicles were serviced and operating in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The next day a Transpacific mechanic identified and rectified the brake defects on the truck Meotti had driven on Feb 28. After taking all relevant factors into account, Justice Barker said he would order Transpacific to pay a $181,500 fine for the Feb 28 breaches listed in declaration 1 because they comprised "one course of conduct". That was 75% of the maximum $242,000 penalty. Similarly, he was satisfied Transpacific's breaches in May, April and May after the fatal incident that were listed in declarations 2-4 were "one continuing contravention". He accepted there was a "systematic servicing problem in this regard,as there were three separate mechanics on three separate occasions who failed to identify any faults". Justice Barker accepted Comcare's submission there was a "less than adequate supervision system in place". He did not believe it necessary for each mechanic to be constantly supervised but the circumstances of the case suggested the system of supervision was "inadequate". Justice Barker said he would impose a further $181,500 fine for the breaches in declarations 2-4 "given the continuing seriousness of the contraventions". He invited Comcare to confer with Transpacific to submit a minute on final orders "that reflect the court's findings". (Comcare v Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd ,FCA 500, 22/05/2015)
· Outside court in the May 22 statement (above), Comcare CEO Jennifer Taylor said the Transpacific case "highlighted" the need for employers to provide robust safety systems, particularly for heavy vehicles. It "showed ongoing, systematic failures in safety practices", Taylor said. "It's also a reminder that in such cases, Comcare will not just consider the final result. We will examine every opportunity a company has had to fix these issues, and we will take appropriate enforcement action."
(Source: Occupational Health News 1111, 27 May, 2015)
Plans to expand the national workplace safety regulator's role were a "disaster waiting to happen" in light of its "demonstrated inability to regulate safety in the workplaces", a lawyers' association claims. The Australian Lawyers Alliance (ALA) used a recent prosecution against construction giant John Holland (JH), which Comcare oversees, as evidence of the federal safety regulator's "series of failures" (OHN 25/3/15). ALA national president Andrew Stone said JH had breached occupational health and safety (OHS) laws several times before the successful prosecution. He said the company was fined $110,000 after a worker suffered a head laceration when a bridge at the Brisbane Airport Link site collapsed. Some months earlier, a worker died when he was crushed to death at the same worksite in an incident still being pursued by the federal safety regular. "There are too many cases like this which clearly show Comcare has a patchy record on workplace safety enforcement and oversight," Stone said. "This court ruling shows that the Comcare scheme has put workers' lives at risk by failing to enforce OHS regulations in the limited number of workplaces for which it has responsibility. In the case, it was noted that JH had breached the OHS Act 1991 Act a number of times already. "It must be asked: where was Comcare in preventing these breaches?" Stone said. "If Comcare is struggling to adequately regulate worker safety across only 33 companies, why on earth would you put more workers from across the country at risk by allowing employers to leave well-funded and well-administered state-based schemes to join Comcare's poorly functioning regulatory arrangements?". A spokesperson for employment minister Senator Eric Abetz told OHN the ALA had an "unfortunate history of defending the rorts and loopholes that currently exist in the Comcare scheme". "The very fact that a prosecution was taken and successful shows that Comcare is an effective and active regulator," he said. "(The ALA) is putting the interests of those who would benefit from the current flaws in the scheme at the expense of taxpayers who fund the scheme." Stone said Comcare reported 13 workplace fatalities within its mandate in its 2014 annual report.
The Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU), at its annual congress in Melbourne, attacked the Comcare reforms urging the Federal Govt to dump its legislation. It pushed for stronger OHS laws to fine or jail directors for safety breaches to ensure companies could not restructure to avoid penalties for negligent conduct.
(Source: Occupational Health News 1111, 27 May, 2015)
Truck drivers and family members demonstrated outside Coles' headquarters last week (May 21) amid claims of unsafe work practices jeopardising transport workers' health and safety. The Transport Workers Union (TWU) claimed the retailer's practices placed pressure on truck drivers to "drive faster, for longer with over-loaded vehicles in a stressed and tired state". The TWU said an average of 330 lives were lost each year in truck-related crashes and many thousands more were injured. It said truck drivers were 15 times more likely to die than any other profession.
(Source: Occupational Health News 1111, 27 May, 2015)
Campaigners employed by the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) for its federal election push will stay on to help affiliates organise their own campaigns around industrial matters, ACTU secretary Dave Oliver has revealed.
The ACTU Congress today (May 27) unanimously approved a $13m budget for its 'Build a Better Future' campaign, which will target 30 marginal electorates and hire 21 campaigners. $10.8m of the $13m will be funded by a permanent $2 per member levy on affiliates.
Oliver said the ACTU campaign unit would shrink to 14 campaigners in the 18 months after the election, but the peak body would maintain a "permanent campaigning capacity".
"We have a federal election, three state elections and two territory elections [in the next three years] … it doesn't make sense to keep ramping up and ramping down campaigns," he said.
Oliver said the ACTU would mobilise the unit to organise affiliates' campaigns around industrial matters.
"They are notionally based in marginal seats, but we want a mobile and nimble nation-wide campaigning team," he said.
Oliver told Workforce Daily the campaigners would help affiliates on industrial matters like the Transport Workers Union's 'Safe Rates' campaign, but not industrial disputes.
After the election, the ACTU campaign team would "aim to achieve key advancements for working people such as secure jobs and portable entitlements", Oliver said.
The campaign will be paid for by a $2 levy on top of the $3.71 ACTU fee paid by affiliates for each member.
From 2016, the $2 levy will be built into the affiliation fee as a "minimum guaranteed campaign" contribution.
Affiliation fees, including the levy, will increase to $5.88 in 2017 and $6.05 in 2018.
Local resourcing the focus of $13m spend
Oliver said the campaign will be ready to roll out by the end of June, in the event the Abbott government calls an early election.
The ACTU would focus its efforts on data, such as aggregating and updating union lists, social media engagement with voters, and ground resources like field campaigners and door-knocking. None of the $13m will pay for national TV advertising, despite that being the "most significant spend" in the successful Your Rights At Work campaign in 2007, Oliver said.
Instead the ACTU would do "low level ads online, on local TV and radio", he said.
Oliver said he hoped "in the cut and thrust of the federal election there will be affiliates who donate resources to run [national] TV ads", as occurred on a state-wide level in the Vic, Qld and NSW state polls.
ACTU could go further: Professionals Australia
Professionals Australia chief executive Chris Walton spoke in favour of the motion, but said the ACTU should consider raising a $5 levy to achieve an ever greater increase in its capacity.
Walton said although unions would "always have to bargain" for their members "if we really want to help [members] and not just negotiate redundancies, we have to shape the environments in which they work".
The ACTU could work at an industry and national level to effect changes to govt funding and legislation, he said.
"We need this to win in our industry campaigns, not just deal with the symptoms."
"I don't support this resolution [because it is] for an election campaign but because we are building a capacity to win for you," Walton said.
He said the ACTU benefited its affiliates through running campaigns on equal pay, minimum wage cases, giving information on legal and economic changes and training unionists.
The ACTU should do more, including "bargaining for us together" on expenses like phones and cars, Walton said.
"We'd save more than $2 a member if we acted on this novel concept called collective bargaining," he said.
(Source: Workforce Daily 19633, 27 May, 2015)
Unions should run "radical" campaigns including sit-ins and blocking roads to "misbehave" and hold corporate power to account, according to the Transport Workers Union (TWU) NSW secretary Michael Aird.
Aird made the comments at the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) yesterday (May 26). He was one of the few delegates to use their time on the floor to champion old-style industrial tactics, with much of the focus of other speakers being the 'Build a Better Future' campaign centred on political campaigning at the next federal election and beyond.
Aird told his fellow delegates the move to enterprise bargaining in the early 1990s and continued in the Fair Work Act had "broken down our solidarity".
"All the great union campaigns are not enterprise campaigns – they are radical, or fought large," he said.
Aird cited United Voice's 'Big Steps' childcare campaign, the equal pay campaign, nurse-to-patient ratios, the TWU's 'Safe Rates' and the Textile Clothing and Footwear Union campaign to lift employment conditions for outworkers.
Conservatives and the Trade Union Royal Commission were "trying to make us think small and behave ourselves". But Aird argued "we're unionists because we're all about misbehaving."
He said the union movement "needs to think more about being radical … our members are up for it, they understand it". "Let's have sit-ins, let's block the roads. Let's take on corporate power. Let's hold power to account."
Aird said "elements of the Labor party" believed tax and welfare were sufficient to achieve fair distribution of wealth. "You know what else is fundamental? Union jobs," he said.
Aird's comments follow TWU national secretary Tony Sheldon last year sayinghis union was considering a campaign of civil disobedience in the face of Qantas job cuts with he and other union officials willing to be arrested (WF 17/04/2014).
Collective bargaining must reach marginalised workers: Ayres
The call to expand collective bargaining rights to an industry level was backed by Australian Manufacturing Workers Union NSW secretary Tim Ayres.
He said the movement needed to help workers who are "remote" and "haven't had the benefit of enterprise bargaining" such as independent contractors, labour hire workers and those in the new economy like Uber drivers.
"What is our membership proposition for people in the new economy? Or who can't access the instruments of the law and the union movement?" Ayres asked.
"Our answer can't be 'more of the same, more energetically'," he said. "More enterprise bargaining won't solve the problem for these people".
(Source: Workforce Daily 19633, 27 May, 2015)
Australia needs to prepare for the jobs of the future as it confronts the risk of automation of low-wage sectors, opposition leader Bill Shorten has said.
Shorten made the comments in an address to the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) Congress today (May 27).
He criticised the view that high wages made Australia less competitive, and warned that "low wage jurisdictions will be replaced by automation".
"We have to be the country which designs, builds and operates the machines," he said.
Australia should prepare for "jobs which haven't yet been developed" because "three out of four jobs in the fastest growing industries will need skills in science, technology, engineering and maths", he said.
"Labor has a plan to put these skills front and centre – we want more Australians to study coding and computational languages."
Shorten said the country faces "massive change" as $100bn of mining investment has dried up and Australia needed to plan for future job growth.
However, he committed Labor to oppose "the race to the bottom in terms of wages and conditions, which erodes the safety net which makes this a great country".
Labor fights against visa exploitation: Shorten
Shorten said Labor had put a submission to the Fair Work Commission minimum wage case for the first time because it recognised "the min wage is not too high, it's a fundamental driver of dignity for people in this country".
He argued the govt was attempting to repair the budget deficit through 'bracket creep', which he described as the "stealthy invisible hand of inflation". "[The govt] puts its hand into your pocket taking your wage increases as increased taxes," he said.
Shorten also promised Labor would "never sign up for the exploitation of people on working visas, no matter what pressure is put on us by the conservatives".
However, last week shadow treasurer Chris Bowen announced Labor would support the Coalition's proposed 32.5% working holiday visa tax from the first dollar earned.
That was despite the National Union of Workers saying the tax would be like "pouring gasoline on a fire" by providing a disincentive to pay the visa workers appropriately and "dooming" them to a black market economy (WF 22/05/2015).
(Source: Workforce Daily 19633, 27 May, 2015)
By Professor Niki Ellis
Adjunct Professor, Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research and Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University
Recently an organisation asked me to consider what being a mentally healthy workplace might look like for them. It was a great brief, they were up for it. I started by having a look at their business strategy and found they were growing, planning to further develop their leadership and workforce and IT platform to enable them to be competitive and make the most of the opportunities they could see.
I then reviewed their current investment and performance in health and safety and concluded that they were a strong performer in the traditional health and safety model. By that I mean they aimed for zero harm in relation to the prevention of injuries. They had started a workplace health promotion program, but it was early days, and quite a long way off best practice.
A team from Johns Hopkins recently described best and promising practice as:
· Health education
· Supportive social and physical environments
· Integration with HR, infrastructure and environmental health and safety
· Links between HP and related programs eg EAP.
And that it works if:
· Goals are aligned to business
· Program design is evidence-based
· Theory-based implementation
· Ongoing evaluation
What they did have was R U OK, and a great start on a health portal. Way to go.
Potential for web-based interventions
In another project I am working on for the life insurance industry we have done a rapid review on the management of psychological claims.
The review found that with regard to treatment there was huge potential with web-based interventions for mental health.
A Canadian case study illustrated the future with a confidential web-based mental health self-management resource. This allows someone to assess their own mental health, provides information on treatment and rehabilitation, with supporting material for doctors and then tools for tracking progress.
The resource was based on recent evidence-based guidelines, and was being marketed to insurers and employers.
A proposal to become a mentally healthy workplace
Meanwhile back in Australia, having assessed the broader strategic environment and what programs were already in place relevant to mental wellbeing; not just in health and safety and workplace health promotion but also in HR more broadly (EAP, diversity strategy, respectful workplace policy etc), I developed a proposal for becoming a mentally healthy workplace.
This drew on two sources of information: Tony La Montagne's model of an integrated approach to mental health in the workplace; and Gloria Sorensen's conceptual model for an integrated approach to the prevention of 'work-related injuries and illness and the enhancement of overall workforce health and wellbeing'.
Tony La Montagne is at the University of Melbourne and his model has four components:
· Prevent harm from psychosocial hazards
· (using work to) Promote positive mental wellbeing
· Early detection
· Manage illness and minimise consequences.
Implementation science is key
Sorensen (above) is the Queen of the integrated approach to workplace health and safety. She is the head of the Centre for Work, Health and Wellbeing at Harvard University.
A colleague of La Montagne's told me the light bulb went on for Sorensen when she was running Quit programs at a foundry, and realised the uselessness of talking to workers about them giving up cigarette smoking in an environment filled with toxic fumes. She presented a generic conceptual model, drawing on implementation science, with the following elements: context (external and organisation); interventions, mediating factors in the work organisation or work environment, mediating factors related to workers, expected early outcomes, and then expected final outcomes, at the first international conference on Total Worker Health, American for the integrated approach, in October last year. (Selected papers from the conference can be found here)
Drafting the strategic direction
Using both frameworks I generated draft strategic directions for this organisation, which essentially draw together and build upon many different strands of activities already in existence across the organisation, with the aim of assisting to deliver on the broader business plan.
· Work design and re-design: Proposed as they were building a new IT platform, the idea is that health and wellbeing becomes a consideration in that work. For existing work process, suggested the addition of psychosocial hazards to the existing risk management system, possibly by using the routine employee opinion survey to collect information on the psychosocial working environment and leadership performance.
· Proposed the concept of work-life balance as a great link between individual behavioural change and work environment change. Could be a focus of communications on the strategy.
· Extension of a middle management development program on mental wellbeing which had already been developed and run out to some. This is key, if you ramp up conversations about mental health in a workplace you need to be confident middle management can deal with mental health issues, otherwise you may see this reflected as an increase in stress claims.
· Inclusion of health and productivity, especially mental health, in review of the leadership development program.
· Continue to develop the health portal in relation to mental wellbeing, noting evidence of effectiveness of web-based self management support and improving mental health literacy.
· Streamlining business metrics: Opportunity to ensure that relevant indicators for mental wellbeing and their link to productivity are included.
I provided three options for the goal. The first two were based on integrated thinking. One was very broad, an aim of improving organisational performance through health. The second was more tightly focussed – improving workforce capability and wellbeing by including mental health considerations in the development of leadership, systems and workforce. The third option was based on extending the traditional model to better include mental health – that is to contribute to achieving zero harm through programs aiming to minimise psychosocial risks and to promote mental health (separately, as is the tradition).
Bravo to this organisation for taking this topic seriously and giving it a good shake. They are in a good position to succeed as they have a strong foundation in a high performing traditional workplace health and safety program, and they are not unused to the concept of psychosocial ergonomics.
There are benefits to be had for workers in terms of improved health outcomes and benefits to employers in terms of performance, presenteeism and absenteeism.
But it is going to take a lot more than asking R U OK.
(Source: Inside OHS 90, 28 May, 2015)
By Stephanie D'Souza
Impairment caused by the use of drugs is a constant concern in industries like mining, building and construction, utilities and the transport sector, where public safety, workplace safety and employee rights are balanced against each-other.
As technology develops to provide different options for testing in the workplace, eg urine, saliva or hair testing, the options to detect drug use farther and farther back in time are becoming available to employers.
Some legal developments under the Fair Work Act would see the preclusion of more sophisticated methods of testing like urine testing on the basis it affects privacy, as was determined by the Fair Work Commission in January 2014 where Endeavour Energy faced off with the Electrical Trades Union (ETU). The union justified this perspective by focusing the application of the law on whether the worker is impaired at work by earlier drug use.
However, the argument is already changing driven by the emergence of different drugs, one union fearing for the safety of its members and employers changing the basis for their drug and alcohol (D&A) policies.
Clayton Utz partner Shae McCartney has analysed the impact of a number of decisions in 2015 which supported employers who have moved to a "zero-tolerance" approach. They have argued their drug and alcohol policies needed to focus on preventing the risk of incident or injury, rather than whether an employee was impaired.
Urine testing 'unjust & unreasonable': 2014
In early 2014, Fair Work Commission Senior Deputy President Jonathan Hamberger ruled for the third time supporting the ETU's position that urine testing was an unfair imposition for Endeavour Energy's employees.
At the time, ETU assistant secretary Neville Betts said: "While oral testing accurately identifies recent drug use, where an individual may be impaired in their abilities, urine tests unfairly monitor workers' private lives by potentially showing a positive result even where a substance may have been used many days prior, in a private capacity."
In the original case SDP Hamberger identified both urine and oral testing were liable to cheating and that for some drugs, like cannabis, oral testing is superior to urine testing particularly when testing for on-the-job impairment.
"Not only is urine testing potentially less capable of identifying someone who is under the influence of cannabis, but it also has the disadvantage that it may show a positive result even though it is several days since the person has smoked the substance."
When he was still a senior partner at Clayton Utz, now FWC Vice President Joe Catanzariti had analysed the decision, saying by describing urine testing as "unjust and unreasonable" SDP Hamberger had supported the requirement to balance competing considerations when constructing policy. That is "the need to ensure a safe workplace against the need to protect employees from undue interference by employers in their personal lives".
Zero-tolerance favoured by courts?
This decision had been described as a landmark and victory for the unions, but Clayton Utz's McCartney says the courts have since been supporting employers' moves away from impairment-based policies.
"A series of recent decisions by the Fair Work Commission have recognised the legitimacy of drug and alcohol policies and procedures in removing safety risks, and the right of employers to take disciplinary action for drug use, even if there's no actual evidence of impairment."
Referencing the statutory duties owned by employers not just to their workers but to people who could be affected by the employers' business, eg the general public, McCartney noted effective drug testing was particular important in "high-risk industries".
She said the debate around efficacy of testing was further complicated by the "emergence of synthetic cannabinoids (such as Kronic) which can affect employees' fitness for work, but may not show up in establishing testing procedures".
FWC full bench does about face on urine
In late 2014 a FWC full bench overturned a decision precluding urine testing at DP World Brisbane. The original decision by Deputy President Anna Booth had found urine testing was "unjust and unreasonable" even when used as a second test after an oral swab returned a "non-negative" result.
The bench decided DP Booth fell into error by concluding she had to consider the merit of using urine for testing; rather she should only have looked to whether the enterprise agreement (EA) precluded it. McCartney noted the full bench drew on evidence "urine testing was an established part of the site-specific drug and alcohol testing arrangements operating at each of DP World's terminals" and workers had not raised concerns about it during EA consultations.
Ferry driver collides with wharf
Another zero-tolerance decision McCartney (above) drew on was at Harbour City Ferries where a ferry driver's reinstatement was overturned after urine testing revealed cannibinoid use.
"The fact that the employer had a zero tolerance drug policy was a key factor in the Full Bench's reasoning in finding that non-compliance with the policy justified termination of employment (as there was no evidence that the employee's drug use caused any impairment nor contributed to the incident)."
The full bench judgment observed Harbour City's emphasised its zero-tolerance policy was required due to its responsibility to public safety.
"[Harbour City] does not want to have a discussion following an accident as to whether or not the level of drug use of one of its captains was a factor," the bench said. "It does not want to listen to the uninformed in the broadcasting or other communications industry talk about drug tests establishing impairment."
The ferry driver had said the use of canniboids was for "pain relief". But the full bench said his decision to use should have informed his subsequent decision to accept a shift "while aware of the likelihood of being in breach" of the D&A policy.
Sara Hopkins and Mark Sullivan from law-firm Lander & Rogers agreed with McCartney's analysis saying the decision was "positive news for employers with zero-tolerance drug and alcohol policies. An employer, particularly where public safety is involved, can require strict compliance with appropriate drug and alcohol policies, without being required to determine that a related safety incident was caused by an employee's impairment".
Urine shows meth in mine operator's sample
In January 2015, the FWC upheld EDI Mining's decision to dismiss a dump truck driver who recorded a methylamphetamine at four times the reporting cut-off figure. McCartney said the decision "provided hope and optimism to even the most jaded employment practitioner".
The worker had submitted she had unknowingly taken the methylamphetamine, saying her drink had been spiked by two strangers over the weekend past.
The Construction Forestry Mining Energy Union (CFMEU) submitted that the worker felt "perfectly well" and the employer had failed to prove any impairment. EDI Mining rejected the need to prove impairment instead drawing on the existence of its "cardinal rule" against non-approved substances.
Commissioner Ian Cambridge said the worker had failed to prove during the hearing that her drink had been spiked and resultantly the employer had acted appropriately to dismiss her, following consideration of the alleged mitigating factor.
"Individuals who attend a workplace like the Mine under the influence of drugs or alcohol endanger the lives of other workers," Cmr Cambridge said. "This test result would of itself, provide valid reason for the employer to terminate the employment of the applicant. This test result was appropriately treated as a prima facie serious risk to the safety of fellow workers."
McCartney said the cmr was "highly critical" of the CFMEU's approach, stating it was "highly regrettable" for an organisation "which apparently conducts campaigns which strongly advocate safety in the workplace".
CFMEU's new 'mandatory testing' policy
As an alternative to zero-tolerance policies, the CFMEU construction division's announced its "Impairment Policy" in March this year. For the first time for the union, the policy recommends mandatory blanket testing for the first time including testing employers, focusing on scrutinising impairment.
CFMEU national construction secretary Dave Noonan said "We acknowledge that testing already happens in specific circumstances in the industry and accept that our membership is increasingly concerned about the problems associated with people turning up to work impaired and the risks this poses."
The CFMEU proposed impairment assessors would be nominated from the safety committee and would be made up equally of employer and employee representatives.
The Master Builders' Association (MBA) welcomed the union's "belated commitment" but was sceptical the CFMEU's motives included trying to persuade Senate cross-benchers there was no need to extend the powers of the Fair Work Building and Construction Commission.
In spite of this, MBA CEO Wilhelm Harnisch said his organisation was ready to discuss practical solutions for implementing the testing regime. "Master Builders will take at face value the CFMEU's commitment to a compulsory random drug and alcohol testing regime because Master Builders is committed to ensuring that construction workers each day return home safely to their wives, partners, children, families and friends."
Workmates beg workmates to quit drug use
The National Cannabis Prevention and Information Centre (NCPIC) released survey results in May, showing of 2,000 people surveyed 40.3% had worked with a cannabis affected colleague believed it reduced their colleague's motivation and almost one-third believed they were impaired.
NCPIC senior researcher Dr Peter Gates said cannabis affects motivation, reaction time and concentration making it a "blue collar and white collar issue".
Some 38.4% of respondents believed cannabis caused decreased concentration in their colleague, and 31.1% believed it had impaired that person's ability to perform complex tasks.
However, the survey also showed self identified cannabis users did not note the same shortcomings in their work that their colleagues observed, although 10% said the quality of their work would improve if they quit.
Gates said "the reality is, if you are a regular cannabis user, there is a chance your colleagues are going to notice you are letting the team down in key performance areas such as motivation and, in turn, productivity".
47% of users admit to being stoned at work
Gates said the data emphasised the need for clear communication about drug use in work-places. Whilst more than 80% of respondents said they would be comfortable raising the issue with affected workers, and more than 50% said they would be comfortable talking to the cannabis user's manager, only 5% of cannabis users said the issue had been raised with them at work. Gates noted more than 47% of the cannabis users surveyed admitted to being stoned at work.
"Employers need to make sure they have clear drug policies in place at work, and that these are not just included in a pile of paperwork during employee induction." Gates emphasised the use of strong assistance programs and making sure workers feel able to ask for help.
The NCPIC added human resources teams should be educated to look for warning signs where longer term effects can be subtle amongst users. "It's easy to spot drug use at a party...but would you think to consider a combination of a lack of focus, motivation, memory and learning challenges or even sleep issues, as a possible drug issue?".
Perception that workers can avoid testing
NCPIC conducted another survey late last year of 500 tradies across mining, construction, transport and defence. The survey said 21% of respondents indicated they had consumed cannabis within four hours of going to work. Almost two-thirds (63%) said they knew someone who had failed a drug test.
Gates noted in these industries, despite rates of random testing increasing, only 29% of respondents believed they would definitely be tested. A third said it was unlikely or there was only a small chance of being tested.
Gates emphasised smoking so close to working was a warning sign: "If [workers] are smoking before work, it's also more likely they are having a problem controlling their use, which is a sign of addiction. No tradie wants to be responsible for hurting a mate while on the job, so knowing the side effects of cannabis use, and weighing up that risk, is really important."
AHPRA testing doctors' hair
In non-high risk industries, like the health sector, focus on drug-related impairment is also increasing. The Australian Health Practitioners Registration Authority (AHPRA) has initiated a far harsher regime of hair testing on all practitioners with substance related impairment.
AHPRA CEO Martin Fletcher said "under the protocol, all health practitioners who have restrictions on their registration linked to past substance abuse will have routine hair testing in addition to urine testing".
The Australian Drug Foundation says hair testing detects past use up to a few months, and can "therefore test for chronic use". AHPRA drew on its role to protect the public and manage risks to patients.
Can employers ask workers to see the doc?
Swaab Attorneys say employers have the option of requiring workers to undergo a medical assessment if the employer can establish that there was evidence to show an employee's limitations at work.
Swaab Partner Warwick Ryan said in one case the Fair Work Cmn had prevented an employer adding bi-yearly examinations of forklift drivers on top of regular medical assessments already required by the National Heavy Vehicle Accreditation scheme.
However, analysing the case Ryan said "the clear learning from this is that where an employee discloses or displays specific health limitations that cast doubt on their ability to carry out their job, employers can require them to undertake a medical assessment before returning to work".
He added the cmr and the union involved had emphasised privacy concerns for workers if medical examinations had been compelled, so employers should "put some thought into how medical information is going to be stored to ensure the privacy of the individual".
(Source: Inside OHS 90, 28 May, 2015)
Casual cleaners at a major sports event company were short-changed by up to two thirds of their hourly rate by the Australian Workers Union (AWU) Victoria branch maintaining an expired WorkChoices agreement that saved their employer millions of dollars a year in wages.
The AWU agreed to maintain the 2006 enterprise agreement past its 2010 expiry date in return for employer Cleanevent paying it $25k a year in 'membership fees' and inflating the branch's membership roll.
The Trade Union Royal Commission (TURC) heard that Cleanevent, which did clean ups for the Formula 1 Grand Prix, the Easter Show and the Melbourne Cup, saved an estimated $2m a year from the arrangement .The company's low casual rates – with substantially reduced penalty rates - were said to be "very attractive" to Spotless, which later acquired the business in 2010.
Labor Vic MP Cesar Melham – who will be called to the stand next week - was the AWU Vic secretary at the time involved in negotiating to continue the agreement and setting the $25k fee.
The cmn heard that the AWU had initially entered negotiations with Cleanevent to replace the 2006 EA in 2010 but ended up agreeing to a three-year Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) instead.
The MOU, which was also signed by then-national secretary Paul Howes, said the 2006 EA would continue to apply, except in so far as the MOU adjusted pay and penalty rates.
Senior counsel Jeremy Stoljar said it appeared the AWU had entered a MOU and not an EA because an EA would not have passed the Fair Work Act's better off overall test as it was "significantly worse" than the modern award.
Stoljar said as a result of the agreement level 1 casual workers were paid $18.14 an hour for public holidays compared to the 2010 award rate of $50.17 an hour. Level 3 casual workers were paid $19.86 an hour for a Sunday when the award gave them $41.44 an hour.
At the same time as the MOU a 'side letter' was agreed to where Cleanevent would pay the AWU up to $25k a year in 'membership fees' and supply it with a list of cleaner names.
Cleaners had 'no knowledge' of membership selection
Then-Cleanevent general manager now business development executive Steven Webber gave evidence to the cmn the company came up with the list of staff it would pay membership fees at "random".
Asked how he knew whether the members wanted to join the union or not, Webber replied "I didn't."
An email to the AWU at the time Webber referred to one of its biannual $12,500k payments as "12,500 big ones!!!"
In a 2012 email about Cleanevent's failure to pay the AWU fee on time, Webber warned staff "this has the ability to cost us some $2m if we pee them [the AWU] off".
On the description of the fee as 'membership fees', Cmr Heydon said "to be blunt about it, the side-letter seems to be a sham".
He said the "actual" agreement was "simply to pass $25k a year and some names of people who had never been asked whether they wanted to join the AWU".
When Stoljar put that an invoice description of the payment as 'membership fees' was "not true or accurate because what was being charged for was not membership fees at all", Webber responded "I'm not sure to be honest".
Asked whether the fee was in exchange for the continuation of the 2006 EA, Webber said it was "part of the process".
Counsel for Melham sought to argue the fee was a "service fee" but did not specify what the "service" was. In any case, Webber says he did not recall Melham using that term in negotiations.
Inflated membership boost AWU power in ALP
Stoljar said in his opening statement the Cleanevent workers chosen for AWU membership were "members" only in the sense that their names were entered on the AWU Vic membership roll but "without their knowledge or authorisation".
Indeed, some were already AWU members and were having their union dues paid "twice over", he said.
Aside from the financial benefit to the AWU Vic, inflated membership numbers increased the branch's influence in its union's national executive as well as the Australian Labor Party (ALP) – which in turn led to greater influence over ALP policy formation, membership of ALP committees and selection of ALP candidates.
"The persons who miss out are the workers," Stoljar said. "Cleanevent's employees, or at least its casual employees, appear to have been significantly worse off under the MOU than they would be under the relevant 2010 award."
He questioned whether the fees were breaches of s287 of the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act in that AWU national or Vic branch officials "seem to have been entering into an arrangement which gained benefits for themselves and Cleanevent … but which were detrimental to their members".
If false accounting was involved to conceal the payment of membership numbers that could be an offence under the Crimes Act, he said.
He said the TURC discussion paper had referred to such payments as "corrupting payments" and asked whether significant penalties should be imposed on employers who make such payments to unions.
AWU member fees cover other companies
Stoljar said over the coming days TURC would investigate other instances where the AWU had raised revenue and inflated membership numbers through 'membership fees'. He named payments from BMD Constructions Pty Ltd, Winslow Constructors Pty Ltd, the Australian Netball Players' Association and the Australian Jockeys Association.
At press time, the cmn was set to call several Cleanevent cleaners to give evidence.
The AWU has decided not to be represented at this week's hearings but is understood to be appearing next week. An AWU Vic spokesperson did not return requests for comment before presstime.
(Source: Workforce Daily 19634, 28 May, 2015)
Disputes about compliance with work health and safety laws and "operational practices" were not "bullying conduct" which could be dealt with by a stop-bullying application, the Fair Work Commission has found.
Andrew Gilbert was accused of bullying by St John's Ambulance WA Ltd volunteer paramedics. St John's, his employer, stood him down while it conducted an investigation.
Gilbert applied to FWC for a stop-bullying order against an employee of St John's Ambulance.
Commissioner Danny Cloghan noted from Gilbert's application he "disagrees with operational practices" of St John's and had made allegations about its compliance with the 'Workplace Health and Safety Act'.
Cmr Cloghan noted Gilbert had mentioned the alleged bully only in the fields to nominate the subject of the order, and not in the "narrative" areas describing alleged bullying conduct.
The cmr said this was "notable" because Gilbert had alleged bullying started in February 2011 and continued until November 2014 and occurred "almost every day".
The cmr found Gilbert was in "obvious conflict" with St John's and volunteer paramedics which could be resolved in "a number of ways".
"However, there is [an] incongruity … between a dispute over operational practices and an application to the cmn alleging bullying," he said.
Cmr Cloghan was satisfied the application was "not the appropriate means to resolve the workplace conflict", and dismissed it for having "no reasonable prospect of success".
(Andrew Gilbert, PR567824, 27/05/2015)
(Source: Workforce Daily 19634, 28 May, 2015)
The Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) Congress has changed the peak body's rules to increase the number of vice presidents (VPs) from five to seven.
The VPs will be elected at the next ACTU executive meeting.
Former Australian Services Union NSW secretary Sally McManus is expected to win one VP position, after moving to the ACTU to take on a campaigning role (WF 2/04/15). However, it's not known who the other VP will be.
On Tuesday (May 26) Shop Distributive Allied Employees Association (SDA) national secretary Gerard Dwyer was elected senior VP, replacing his predecessor Joe de Bruyn.
Australian Workers Union (AWU) national secretary Scott McDine withdrew his nomination for the senior VP position, reportedlydue to the AWU's opposition to the ACTU $2 a member campaign levy (WF 27/05/15).
McDine told Workforce Daily he will not seek a VP position.
Oliver plays down levy dissent
The Australian Financial Review reported that the AWU and Rail Tram and Bus Union yesterday (May 27) abstained from the congress vote on the increased campaign levy due to their opposition to it. The motion was carried on the voices.
Today (May 28) Oliver said "we didn't hear any dissent [when the vote was taken] … the decision was taken, and it is very clear this Congress has backed the [campaign] plan for the next three years".
(Source: Workforce Daily 19634, 28 May, 2015)
About 50 manufacturing workers were protesting outside Canterbury Windows South Melbourne factory at presstime (May 28), after they were locked out over a pay dispute.
The workers are seeking a 4% a year pay increase over three years, with the company offering 1%, 2% and 2%.
The dispute came to a head yesterday after the union withdrew a threatened eight-hour stoppage planned for today and a further four-hour stoppage for tomorrow, only to see the company impose a lock out over both eight-hour shifts.
Victorian secretary of the Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union's forestry/furnishing division Frank Vari told Workforce Daily negotiations with the company had "ground to a halt".
But Vari said workers were determined to see the matter through, "lock out or not lock out".
Canterbury Windows general manager Paul Armstrong told WF Daily union withdrawal of threatened industrial action came too late for the company, which had stopped deliveries in anticipation of the strike.
He claimed the company's workers already received pay levels 25% better than the rest of the industry.
"It is a tough market and we're asking workers to recognise that by accepting what we believe is an affordable increase."
(Source: Workforce Daily 19634, 28 May, 2015)
A deal to cut the legislated 2020 renewable energy target (RET) by 8,000GWh may yet fall apart over the Federal Government insisting on listing native forest wood waste as a renewable energy source in a Bill tabled this week.
The Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment Bill (REE Bill) tabled on May 27 by environment minister Greg Huntreflected bipartisan agreement on reducing the legislated target from 41,000GWh to 33,000GWh. The Bill would axe the destabilising two-yearly reviews of the RET scheme by the Climate Change Authority (CCA) and exempt emissions-intensive, trade-exposed (EITE) industries from compliance with the scheme, as Hunt agreed with Opposition climate change spokesperson Mark Butler last week.
It would overturn Labor's 2011 change to RET regulation 8, which removed native forest biomass as an eligible energy source. But the Bill would also shift the regulation's definition of eligible woody biomassinto the legislation, and significantly changed the definition.
The explanation of Hunt's Bill referred to the definition of eligible woody biomass as "protections". It would introduce the term "ecologically sustainable forest management principles" into the RET legislation. To be eligible to earn renewable energy certificates under the RET the Bill said the biomass must have been harvested primarily for a purpose other than for biomass for energy. The biomass must be either a by- or waste product of a govt-approved harvesting operation that meets a new "high-value test", or a by-product of an operation based on ecologically sustainable forest management principles. The harvesting operation must be covered by a regional forest agreement or meet equivalent ecologically sustainable forest management principles "to the satisfaction of the minister", the explanatory memorandum said.
The REE Bill's new "high-value test" would ensure the forestry operation's primary purpose was sawlog, veneer, poles, pile, girder, carpentry or craft wood, or oil product production and that it derived most of its financial value from those products.
Senators will decide Bill's fate
The govt shifting the RET's legal definition of woody biomass came as a surprise to many, including the clean energy industry, after the drawn-out negotiations between the major parties meant to seal a bipartisan deal on the scheme's future was finally forged last week. Most had expected the govt would table a separate regulatory amendment to reintroduce native-forest wood biomass into the RET.
The govt's move generated a clash between Labor and Greens MPs. New Greens leader Senator Richard Di Natale demanded Labor "abandon its deal to cut the RET, which was introduced to parliament today and allows for the burning of native forests". Labor Opposition climate change spokesperson Mark Butler rejected as "completely false Di Natale's suggestion Labor's deal with the govt was designed to allow native forest biomass back into the scheme in return for dropping the CCA's biannual reviews. Labor "does not support burning native forests as a renewable energy source" and would move to amend the Bill, Butler said. "We opposed it in govt and we oppose it now," he said.
That means the Bill's fate rests on the govt securing the needed Senate six cross-bench votes for it to pass as is. Alternatively, the govt may be hoping Labor will cave into industry and forestry union pressure and pass it without amendment, Carbon Extra sources said. Hunt has not yet delivered the Bill's second reading and his office has not responded to Carbon Extra's question.
RET regs will prevent EITE windfall, govt says
The Bill's (above) 100 exemption for EITEs from having to comply with the RET scheme would introduce new electricity intensity baselines for EITE activities, the explanatory memorandum said.
More flexible' RET regulations
That created a risk some EITE firms may receive "assistance that exceeds the cost impact of the RET on these EITE activities". The govt would consult on the detail of amended regulations "to address this risk", it said. Therefore, the REE Bill (above) would allow "more flexible" regulations "in terms of how they may characterise or describe the amount of an exemption certificate".
(Source: Carbon Extra 319, 29 May 2015)
Clean Energy Regulator (CER) CEO Chloe Munro this week confirmed most of the carbon abatement contracted after the first emissions reduction fund (ERF) auction last month would come from projects already operating under the former Federal Government's carbon farming initiative (CFI).
The CER spent about $660m of the ERF's total $2.55bn funds on the first auction, paying on average $13.95 per tonne/CO2-e for a total of 47m tonnes of abatement.
Under questioning inSenator Estimates this week, Munro said 107 of 144 projects underERF contracts had transitioned from the CFI. The 34.4m tonnes of carbonabatement they would deliver represented 72% of the total abatement contracted from the first auction, she said. The remaining 37 projects were new. Opposition climate change spokespersonMark Butler saidthatmeant the govt had effectivelypaid $66t/CO2-e for "only 10m additional tonnes of carbon abatement".
(Source: Carbon Extra 319, 29 May 2015)
Newly updated federal regulatory guidance takes into account the "broader scope" of emissions reduction fund (ERF) project types, new participants and "anticipated" aggregated structures that "may emerge".
The Australian Securities & Investments Commission's (ASIC) latest Regulatory Guide 236 (RG 236) also affirms who "may need" Aust financial services licences (AFSLs) under the Federal Government's revised carbon markets regime. In March, after negative reaction, the govt split its plans to exempt some ERF participants from having to hold AFSLs (Carbon Extra 20/03/15).
ASIC's updated RG 236, released on May 20, confirmed Australian carbon credit units (ACCUs) and eligible international emissions units (EIEUs) were financial products.
Providing information on ACCUs or EIEUs to another person could constitute financial product advice in some circumstances, the guide said. Eg, where the information was intended to influence their decisions on regulated emissions units or "could reasonably be regarded as being intended to have such an influence". Providing financial product advice could relate to an ERF project or to people seeking to produce EIEUs through developing or operating international offset projects. It could include advice given to voluntary emissions offsetters "on approaches to, or strategies for, acquiring or disposing of regulated emissions units". Providing advice to entities covered by the govt's proposed safeguard mechanism to help them make decisions about acquiring or disposing of regulated emissions units could also constitute financial product advice.
The guide noted other emissions-related financial products included derivatives over emissions units and interests in managed investment schemes involving carbon abatement activities or emissions units. Carbon abatement contracts themselves were not financial products, RG 236 said. That meant people did not require AFSLs to provide advice about those contracts or deal in them.
ASIC in an online statement said it had worked closely with the federal environment department and the Clean Energy Regulator (CER) to "anticipate a variety of different structures of ERF aggregated projects that may emerge". However, ASIC said it would "monitor the need to more closely align its guidance to emerging and evolving ERF practices".
Carbon Extra sources say it's likely the next ERF auction, expected later this year, will see bids based on the scheme's method for aggregated energy efficiency projects. The legal technicalities, including ASIC's final position on who needed AFSLs, had stalled market players forging the multiple contracts involved in preparing aggregated projects for bid.
(Source: Carbon Extra 319, 29 May 2015)
On Monday June 1, peak state union body Unions NSW will protest outside federal Treasurer Joe Hockey's office against govt cuts to paid parental leave. Unions NSW encouraged supporters to bring "dummies" and their baby or toddler as part of the protest.
(Source: Workforce NSW 19635, 29 May 2015)